Effects of early atipamezole reversal of medetomidine-ketamine anesthesia in mice.

J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Published: November 2011

Rodents are often anesthetized by using ketamine and medetomidine, with reversal by atipamezole. Methods vary for times of administration of the atipamezole, and literature is lacking regarding appropriate reversal time. We investigated the recovery of mice reversed with atipamezole 10 min (early) or 40 min (late) after induction of anesthesia. Time to regain pinch-reflex or righting reflex did not differ between the 2 reversal points, but time to walking was significantly greater in mice that underwent early reversal with atipamezole. This delay was not mitigated by administration of atropine as part of the anesthetic regimen. Inclusion of acetylpromazine in the anesthetic regimen shortened the time needed to reach a surgical plane of anesthesia but also prolonged recovery times as determined by righting reflex and time to walking.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228931PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reversal atipamezole
8
righting reflex
8
time walking
8
anesthetic regimen
8
atipamezole
5
reversal
5
time
5
effects early
4
early atipamezole
4
atipamezole reversal
4

Similar Publications

EVALUATION OF ETORPHINE-MEDETOMIDINE-MIDAZOLAMAZAPERONE FOR IMMOBILIZATION IN CAPTIVE PRONGHORN ().

J Zoo Wildl Med

December 2024

Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N 5B4, SK, Canada.

Etorphine based immobilization protocols are reported to be effective in pronghorn; however, information on cardiorespiratory effects is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and cardiopulmonary effects of etorphine, medetomidine, midazolam, and azaperone for immobilization in captive pronghorn. Additionally, the effects of endotracheal intubation and manual ventilation on cardiopulmonary variables were assessed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To assess the effect of two different doses of intramuscular atipamezole on head height (HH) in horses after sedation with detomidine.

Study Design: Randomized, blinded, triple crossover study.

Animals: Eight healthy adult horses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of intramuscular medetomidine versus medetomidine-vatinoxan sedation in bearded dragons (Pogonavitticeps).

Vet Anaesth Analg

January 2025

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.

Objective: To assess sedation following intramuscular (IM) administration of medetomidine versus medetomidine-vatinoxan in bearded dragons.

Study Design: Prospective, randomized, experimental, crossover study.

Animals: A group of 10 (five males and five females) bearded dragons (mean mass ± standard deviation 172 ± 28 g).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Butorphanol-azaperone-medetomidine (BAM) is commonly used for white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) immobilization in captive and free-ranging populations. It is a federally regulated controlled substance requiring stringent regulatory compliance, complicating field application. A prescription-only drug combination, nalbuphine-medetomidine-azaperone® (NalMed-A) provides a less-regulated alternative for use by wildlife professionals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three methods for administering atipamezole—intranasal atomization, intranasal drops, and intramuscular injection—in reversing sedation from medetomidine in healthy dogs.
  • A total of 40 mixed-breed shelter dogs were included, with various parameters like sedation score, heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure measured at different times during the study.
  • Results showed that intramuscular injection led to the quickest recovery from sedation, while both intranasal methods were effective but slower; no serious adverse effects were noted during the process.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!