'Doing the "right" thing': how parents experience and manage decision-making for children's 'normalising' surgeries.

Soc Sci Med

University of Manchester, Health Sciences, School of Community Based Medicine, 5th Floor, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.

Published: March 2012

Using cleft lip and palate as an exemplar, this article examines parents' decision-making for children in the context of elective treatments which aim to 'normalise' a child's function, appearance, communication or identity. Using purposive and theoretical sampling, 35 parents with children from infancy to young adulthood were recruited through a specialist cleft centre in England. Parents were interviewed in-depth between 2006 and 2008 about their beliefs and motivations in relation to treatment decision-making in this context. A grounded theory approach was used to analyse the data. Findings revealed a core category, 'doing the "right" thing', that encapsulated parents' main concern in relation to their children's treatment and highlighted several emotional, social and cultural considerations underpinning their decision-making stance. Parents fulfilled a perceived 'moral' obligation to be 'good' parents by pursuing the 'normalising' treatments, particularly surgeries, made available to their children. Such treatments were viewed as a way of facilitating their child's social inclusion and helping them reach their full potential. In order to enable their continued pursuit of treatments over the long-term, parents also constructed specialist practitioners as highly competent and particularly trustworthy. This article captures the complexities involved in parents' decision-making for children's elective 'normalising' treatments, where both functional and appearance-related concerns are involved. It suggests that social norms about parenting, physical appearance and healthcare practitioner power may significantly shape decision-making in this context, so that such choices may be viewed primarily as 'moral' rather than social. Services could support parents with such challenges, by gauging their needs for information about surgery and its likely outcomes and providing emotional/decisional support to consider all available options.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

'doing "right"
8
"right" thing'
8
decision-making children's
8
parents' decision-making
8
decision-making context
8
'normalising' treatments
8
parents
7
decision-making
6
treatments
5
thing' parents
4

Similar Publications

A 50-year-old woman with a history of adult granulosa cell tumor (AGCT) of the right ovary was under follow-up after undergoing several surgeries, including a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. She was initially diagnosed eight years ago and remained disease-free for 52 months. However, she later experienced a recurrence, indicated by elevated inhibin B levels (58 ng/mL) and the presence of peritoneal soft tissue tumors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Social stigma and the marginalisation of abortion care within medical settings can negatively affect abortion providers. While some research has evaluated stigma interventions in legally restrictive settings, little work has explored the experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) providing abortion and post-abortion care (PAC) outside the USA. This study, part of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' 'Making Abortion Safe' programme, aimed to understand providers' experiences of abortion stigma in four African countries with restrictive legislation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Every day, medical interpreters encounter the vulnerabilities of patients with limited English proficiency and systemic barriers to doing the right thing for patients. The narratives in this issue of NIB demonstrate a love of the interpretive practice. There are many stories of advocacy that go above and beyond what is expected of them.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of primary care professionals about the food guide for children up to 2 years old: a cross-sectional study, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil, 2023.

Epidemiol Serv Saude

December 2024

Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of primary health care professionals in Brazil about breastfeeding and complementary feeding according to the country's food guide for children under 2 years old.
  • - Conducted from October to December 2023, the research involved an online questionnaire completed by 74 professionals, including community health agents, nurses, and physicians, revealing that half had low knowledge, especially about complementary foods.
  • - Findings indicated that while physicians and nurses felt more qualified to provide dietary advice, their actual practices showed a lack of guidance on breastfeeding and complementary feeding, highlighting significant deficiencies in knowledge and practice among health workers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) is considered good practice in all health research including literature reviews. Reporting of involvement practice in realist reviews has been inconsistent leaving gaps in understanding of best practice. Realist reviews are theory driven and explain how interventions work, for whom and in which circumstances.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!