AI Article Synopsis

  • Structured antiretroviral therapy interruption (TI) is often necessary but can lead to negative outcomes; this study investigates strategies to reduce resistance to treatment during TI.
  • 106 HIV-1-infected patients on stable treatment were divided into two groups: one continued therapy, while the other followed a staggered interruption approach, stopping certain drugs at different times.
  • Results indicated that while staggered interruptions did not completely prevent resistance mutations, they did not always cause virological failure upon resuming therapy, suggesting that ongoing monitoring of plasma RNA may be more indicative of treatment risks than initial testing.

Article Abstract

Background: Structured antiretroviral therapy interruption (TI) is discouraged because of poorer AIDS and non-AIDS-related outcomes, but is often inevitable in clinical practice. Certain strategies could reduce the emergence of resistance mutations related to TI.

Methods: A total of 106 HIV-1-infected patients on stable HAART with undetectable plasma viral load were randomized to therapy continuation (n=50) or CD4(+) T-cell-guided TI (n=56). Staggered interruption involved stopping non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) 7 days before the nucleoside backbone. Genotypic resistance testing (GRT) was performed on proviral DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at baseline and before each TI, and on plasma RNA after each TI.

Results: At baseline, GRT on PBMCs detected mutations in nine patients and only two major mutations were identified. GRT on plasma samples performed after TIs showed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), NNRTI and protease inhibitor major resistance associated mutations in 10/56, 3/46 and 1/8 patients receiving these drugs, respectively. Only in two patients had the same mutations been observed in GRT on PBMCs at baseline. Three patients presented virological failure after resumption of therapy, all receiving NNRTIs. In one of them, resistance mutations detected at failure had been also observed previously in GRT on plasma after TI.

Conclusions: Staggered interruption of NNRTIs 7 days before the nucleoside backbone does not avoid resistance emergence completely, but does not necessarily lead to virological failure after treatment resumption. Plasma HIV-1 RNA genotype after the interruption and the patient's treatment history seem to be more useful than baseline proviral DNA genotype to assess the risk of virological failure after restarting therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3851/IMP2025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

proviral dna
12
virological failure
12
plasma rna
8
peripheral blood
8
blood mononuclear
8
mononuclear cells
8
antiretroviral therapy
8
resistance mutations
8
staggered interruption
8
reverse transcriptase
8

Similar Publications

Background: Persistent latent reservoirs of intact HIV-1 proviruses, capable of rebounding despite suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART), hinder efforts towards an HIV-1 cure. Hence, assays specifically quantifying intact proviruses are crucial to assess the impact of curative interventions. Two recent assays have been utilized in clinical trials: intact proviral DNA assay (IPDA) and quadruplex quantitative PCR (Q4PCR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mutation Rate Variation and Other Challenges in 2-LTR Dating of Primate Endogenous Retrovirus Integrations.

J Mol Evol

December 2024

Laboratory of Experimental Virology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

The time of integration of germline-targeting Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) retroposons, such as endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), can be estimated by assessing the nucleotide divergence between the LTR sequences flanking the viral genes. Due to the viral replication mechanism, both LTRs are identical at the moment of integration, when the provirus becomes part of the host genome. After that time, proviral sequences evolve within the host DNA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Variability in HIV-1 transmitted/founder virus susceptibility to combined APOBEC3F and APOBEC3G host restriction.

J Virol

December 2024

Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Several APOBEC3 enzymes restrict HIV-1 by deaminating cytosine to form uracil in single-stranded proviral (-)DNA. However, HIV-1 Vif counteracts their activity by inducing their proteasomal degradation. This counteraction by Vif is incomplete, as evidenced by footprints of APOBEC3-mediated mutations within integrated proviral genomes of people living with HIV-1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Identifying risk factors for HIV rebound after treatment interruption is crucial for designing effective remission strategies.

Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from participants in the Zurich HIV Primary Infection Cohort (ZPHI, N=73) and ACTG study A5345 (N=44) were analyzed before ART interruption. We measured cell-associated HIV RNA, total HIV DNA, and proviral diversity (env gene).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The main obstacle to achieving an HIV-1 cure is the proviral reservoir. To promote equity in HIV cure strategies, it is crucial to study the viral reservoir of the predominant HIV-1 subtype C in both women and men. Therefore, we investigated the dynamics of the (intact) viral reservoir in relation to plasma viral load (VL), CD4 T cell count, and immune activation before and during 96 weeks of successful antiretroviral therapy (ART).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!