Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To evaluate a limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) diagnosis method based on the detection of the MUC5AC transcript by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in comparison with the standard diagnostic method based on goblet cell detection by periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-hematoxylin staining, using samples obtained from corneal epithelium impression cytology (IC).
Design: Transversal, comparative case series.
Participants: We studied 59 eyes from 43 patients clinically diagnosed with LSCD.
Methods: Impression cytology was used to gather cells from corneal and conjunctival epithelium from the same eye. The presence of goblet cells in the cornea was determined by PAS-hematoxylin staining, whereas the presence of the MUC5AC transcript was detected by RT-PCR using a custom-designed primer pair.
Main Outcome Measures: Goblet cells in the corneal epithelium were detected by light microscopy, and the MUC5AC transcript was detected as the corresponding PCR amplicon in agarose gels.
Results: Our study included 59 corneal samples, together with their respective conjunctival samples for RT-PCR assays. Of these, 47 samples were also available for comparative PAS-hematoxylin staining. The MUC5AC amplicon was detected in 56 of 59 (94.9%) corneal epithelium samples. In contrast, conventional IC staining detected goblet cells in only 17 of 47 (36.2%) samples; these were not found in 27 of 47 (57.4%) samples (negative results), and 3 of 47 (6.4%) showed inconclusive results.
Conclusions: The detection of the MUC5AC transcript in corneal epithelium is a more sensitive method to diagnose LSCD than the conventional PAS-hematoxylin method, although a minimum RNA concentration of 1.2 ng/μl is required for negative results to be reliable. Moreover, RT-PCR is a highly specific and more objective technique. Overall, these findings indicate that molecular analysis facilitates a more precise clinical diagnosis of LSCD, thereby reducing the risk of surgical failure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.031 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!