Background: The efficacy and side-effect profile of ulipristal acetate as compared with those of leuprolide acetate for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids before surgery are unclear.
Methods: In this double-blind noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 307 patients with symptomatic fibroids and excessive uterine bleeding to receive 3 months of daily therapy with oral ulipristal acetate (at a dose of either 5 mg or 10 mg) or once-monthly intramuscular injections of leuprolide acetate (at a dose of 3.75 mg). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with controlled bleeding at week 13, with a prespecified noninferiority margin of -20%.
Results: Uterine bleeding was controlled in 90% of patients receiving 5 mg of ulipristal acetate, in 98% of those receiving 10 mg of ulipristal acetate, and in 89% of those receiving leuprolide acetate, for differences (as compared with leuprolide acetate) of 1.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -9.3 to 11.8) for 5 mg of ulipristal acetate and 8.8 percentage points (95% CI, 0.4 to 18.3) for 10 mg of ulipristal acetate. Median times to amenorrhea were 7 days for patients receiving 5 mg of ulipristal acetate, 5 days for those receiving 10 mg of ulipristal acetate, and 21 days for those receiving leuprolide acetate. Moderate-to-severe hot flashes were reported for 11% of patients receiving 5 mg of ulipristal acetate, for 10% of those receiving 10 mg of ulipristal acetate, and for 40% of those receiving leuprolide acetate (P<0.001 for each dose of ulipristal acetate vs. leuprolide acetate).
Conclusions: Both the 5-mg and 10-mg daily doses of ulipristal acetate were noninferior to once-monthly leuprolide acetate in controlling uterine bleeding and were significantly less likely to cause hot flashes. (Funded by PregLem; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00740831.).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1103180 | DOI Listing |
Expert Opin Investig Drugs
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Introduction: Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs), such as mifepristone and ulipristal acetate (UPA), have demonstrated high efficacy and safety as single-dose treatments for medication abortion and emergency contraception (EC). Other obstetrical and gynecologic applications have emerged, both for episodic and ongoing uses. The potential of these compounds to provide estrogen-free, ongoing contraception is promising; however, the rare, but serious, hepatic injury cases seen with UPA have put at least a temporary halt to further research in this area.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProg Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry
October 2024
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Sweden. Electronic address:
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
September 2024
Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Division, Medicines for Human Use Department, Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain.
Purpose: Since late 2017, the use of ulipristal acetate 5 mg (UPA; Proprietary name: Esmya) has been under review in the European Union, due to an emerging hepatic risk. In February 2018 and in July 2018, the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices and the marketing authorization holder put two risk minimization measures (RMM) in place, in order to inform about new safety information and to mitigate this risk. This study aims to assess RMM effectiveness in Spain, by performing an interrupted time-series (ITS) analyses, between 2014 and 2019.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRev Med Liege
September 2024
Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU Liège, Belgique.
Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) are synthetic steroid compounds that interact with the progesterone receptor, inducing various agonist, antagonist or mixed responses. First identified with mifepristone, they are now represented by ulipristal acetate (UPA), used for emergency contraception and uterine fibroids. Despite a few rare cases of severe hepatic insufficiency, SPRMs offer advantages in the treatment of uterine fibroids, reducing their volume without the hypoestrogenic side-effects of GnRH agonists, thus preserving patients' bone capital and quality of life.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBest Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
December 2024
Chalmers Sexual Health Centre, NHS Lothian, 2a Chalmers St, Edinburgh, EH3 9ES, United Kingdom; Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh BioQuarter, Edinburgh, EH16 4UU, United Kingdom. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!