Purpose: This study evaluated the ability of flexible instruments compared with rigid instruments to place anatomic femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions by use of both transtibial drilling and anteromedial drilling without hyperflexion.
Methods: Rigid and flexible pins were placed in 12 matched pairs of cadaveric knees with transtibial drilling (6 pairs) and anteromedial drilling (6 pairs) at 110° of flexion. Intraosseous pin lengths, femoral exit locations, and tunnel alignment were measured.
Results: Transtibial drilling with rigid pins placed relatively vertical femoral tunnels 5.8 ± 1.0 mm superior to the central anterior cruciate ligament insertion. Transtibial drilling with flexible pins placed tunnels in the center of the femoral attachment, but the tunnels were relatively close to the posterior femoral cortex, with a mean distance of 8.0 ± 5.9 mm (P < .05), compared with transtibial drilling with rigid pins. Anteromedial drilling resulted in central anatomic pin placements with rigid and flexible instruments. Tunnel lengths with flexible pins were longer (42.0 ± 7.2 mm) compared with tunnel lengths with rigid pins (32.5 ± 7.1 mm) (P < .01). Flexible pins exited farther from the posterior cortex compared with rigid pins (P < .01). In 3 of 6 knees with rigid pins, the exit point was at the posterior border of the femoral cortex. All flexible pins exited a safe distance from the posterior femoral cortex.
Conclusions: Transtibial drilling with rigid instruments did not produce anatomic femoral tunnels. Transtibial drilling with flexible pins produced anatomic tunnels, but the tunnels were close to the posterior femoral cortex. Anteromedial drilling without hyperflexion produced anatomic tunnels by use of rigid and flexible instruments, but with flexible instruments, the tunnels were longer and were farther from the posterior femoral cortex. Anteromedial drilling with flexible pins produced tunnels with good length and the best position.
Clinical Relevance: Flexible instruments compared with rigid instruments can facilitate the creation of anatomic femoral tunnels by use of anteromedial drilling without hyperflexion.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.029 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
July 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.
Background: The current literature comparing femoral tunnel techniques often reports on short-term outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but only a few studies have analyzed long-term outcomes. In addition, many studies have compared transtibial to anteromedial portal techniques without differentiating whether rigid or flexible reaming is used, making it difficult to infer how the techniques truly compare to one another.
Purpose: This study aimed to detect differences in patient-reported outcome scores in those treated with three different femoral tunnel drilling techniques.
Orthop J Sports Med
June 2024
OrthoCarolina Sports Medicine Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Background: A novel hybrid transtibial (HTT) approach to femoral tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been developed that circumvents the need for knee hyperflexion and orients the graft in the most anatomic position without sacrificing the tunnel length or aperture.
Hypothesis: Patients who underwent ACLR utilizing the HTT technique would achieve excellent patient-reported outcome scores and experience low rates of graft failure and reoperations.
Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Biomed Eng Online
June 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Background: During the transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, drilling depth excessively longer than the tibial tunnel length (TTL) is an important reason to cause popliteal neurovascular bundle injury when preparing the tibial tunnel. This study aims to develop an in-vitro three-dimensional surgical simulation technique to determine the TTL in anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) approaches.
Methods: A total of 63 knees' 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography models were included in this study.
J Orthop
October 2024
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Building 26 - University School of Nursing, Carr. de San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690, Alicante, Spain.
Background: Limited evidence is available comparing the modified transtibial (MTT) and transportal (TP) techniques in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and their impact on returning to sports participation. The objective was to analyze the outcomes after arthroscopic reconstruction of the ACL in recreational athletes with a 2-year postoperative follow-up, comparing the MTT and TP techniques, based on the method used to drill the femoral tunnel.
Hypotesis: The rate of return to sport would be comparable regardless of the surgical technique used.
Sci Rep
May 2024
Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Postgraduate, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, RM, Chile.
Stress concentration on the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLr) for femoral drillings is crucial to understanding failures. Therefore, we described the graft stress for transtibial (TT), the anteromedial portal (AM), and hybrid transtibial (HTT) techniques during the anterior tibial translation and medial knee rotation in a finite element model. A healthy participant with a non-medical record of Anterior Cruciate Ligament rupture with regular sports practice underwent finite element analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!