Objectives: To determine the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, to differentiate benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors and to assess the feasibility and interest of modelling enhancement curves.

Patients And Methods: This retrospective study includes 118 patients with soft-tissue tumors, examined with ultrasound after injection of SonoVue(®), a contrast product. The raw data were treated with CHI-Q acquisition software to model the enhancement curves. We analyzed tumor uptake of the contrast product visually and studied the enhancement curves, characterized by five parameters: peak intensity, time to peak, mean transit time, initial slope, and area under the curve.

Results: There were 81 benign and 37 malignant tumors. For a diagnosis of benign tumor, the absence of contrast uptake had a sensitivity of 60%, a specificity of 68%, a positive predictive value of 50% and a negative predictive of 83%. Study of the 70 curves obtained (48 benign and 22 malignant tumors) showed that the parameters of area under the curve (Chi(2)=8.6 and P<0.005), slope (Chi(2)=8.12 and P=0.004), and peak intensity (Chi(2)=7.55, P=0.005) differed significantly between the two populations.

Conclusion: Absence of contrast uptake suggests a benign lesion. The study of enhancement curves showed significant differences between the different tumor populations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2011.11.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

soft-tissue tumors
12
benign malignant
12
contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
8
contrast product
8
enhancement curves
8
malignant tumors
8
tumors
5
ultrasonography peripheral
4
peripheral soft-tissue
4
tumors feasibility
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!