Purpose: To assess visual performance and ocular aberrations in keratoconic patients using toric soft contact lenses (SCL), rigid-gas-permeable (RGP) contact lenses and spectacle lens correction.
Methods: Twenty-two keratoconus patients (16 RGP lens wearers and six spectacle wearers) were fitted with toric SCL. Ocular aberrations were measured with and without the patient's habitual RGP lenses and with the SCL in place. In the spectacle wearers, aberrations were measured with and without the SCL. Visual performance (high- and low-contrast visual acuity) was evaluated with the patient's habitual correction and with the SCL.
Results: In the RGP lens wearers both the habitual lenses and the toric SCL significantly reduced coma, trefoil, 3rd-order, 4th-order cylinder and higher-order root-mean-square (RMS) aberrations (p ≤ 0.015). In the spectacle wearers the toric SCL significantly reduced coma, 3rd-order and higher-order RMS aberrations (p ≤ 0.01). The patients' habitual RGP lenses gave better low-contrast acuity (p ≤ 0.006) compared to the toric SCL; however, no significant difference was found between lens types for high-contrast acuity (p = 0.10). In the spectacle wearers no significant differences in visual performance measurements were found between the patients' spectacles and the toric SCL (p ≥ 0.06).
Conclusion: The results show that RGP lenses provided superior visual performances and greater reduction of 3rd-order aberrations compared to toric SCL in this group of keratoconic patients. In the spectacle-wearing group, visual performance with the toric SCL was found to be comparable to that measured with spectacles. Nevertheless, with the exception of spherical aberration, the toric SCL were successful in significantly reducing uncorrected higher-order aberrations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00889.x | DOI Listing |
Int J Ophthalmol
August 2021
Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Amity University, Haryana 122003, India.
Aim: To compare the visual acuity (VA), comfort, and patient preference in a soft toric contact lens (TCL) versus soft spherical contact lens (SCL) in low astigmatic subjects during the contact lens (CL) trial.
Methods: This subject-masked, block randomized, 2×2 crossover study recruited 40 neophyte subjects (80 eyes) aged 18 to 33y with astigmatism in the range of 0.75-1.
Turk J Ophthalmol
August 2018
University of Health Sciences, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ophthalmology Clinic, Ankara, Turkey.
Objectives: To assess the long-term effects of soft contact lenses (SCL) on the cornea and anterior chamber by topography.
Materials And Methods: Thirty-nine eyes of 22 healthy patients were included in this prospective study. Changes in corneal and anterior chamber parameters before and after 12 months of daily SCL use (Air Optix Aqua, Air Optix Aqua for Astigmatism, Acuvue Oasys and Acuvue Oasys for Astigmatism) were evaluated with Pentacam (Oculus, Germany).
Eye Contact Lens
September 2018
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Optometry (S.M.C., J.J.N.), Birmingham, AL; The Ohio State University College of Optometry (K.M.B.), Columbus, OH; The Ocular Surface Institute (D.A.B., J.H.M., D.R.P.), University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX; and Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc (B.K.L., K.O.L.), Jacksonville, FL.
Objectives: To assess whether patient-reported measures are improved with soft toric contact lenses (TCLs) compared with soft spherical contact lenses (SCLs) and whether clinical time needed to fit TCL is greater than SCL.
Methods: Habitual contact lens wearers with vertexed spherical refraction +4.00 to +0.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye
December 2016
Eurolens Research, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Purpose: To understand long-term contact lens prescribing habits of Canadian optometrists.
Methods: One thousand optometrists were surveyed annually from 2000 to 2015. Information was requested on the first ten patients examined after receiving the survey.
Optom Vis Sci
August 2016
*OD, FAAO †MPhil, PhD, FCOptom, FAAO ‡PhD §MSc Clinical Trial Consultant, Atlanta, Georgia (RLC); Visioncare Research Ltd, Farnham, United Kingdom (GY, CH); and Alcon Research, Ft. Worth, Texas (JK, LN).
Purpose: To characterize and compare the prevalence of soft contact lens-related (SCL) dryness symptoms in large populations of SCL wearers in North America (NAm) and the United Kingdom (UK).
Methods: SCL wearers from NAm (n = 1443) and UK (n = 932) sites completed self-administered questionnaires on SCL symptoms and wearing experiences. A categorization for contact lens-related dry eye (CL-DE) was applied that combined Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ) items on dryness frequency and intensity at the end of the day (CL-DE+ = constantly/frequently/sometimes plus intensity = 3-5, and CL-DE- = never/rarely plus intensity = 0-1, Marginal = all other ratings).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!