What makes an act of killing morally wrong is not that the act causes loss of life or consciousness but rather that the act causes loss of all remaining abilities. This account implies that it is not even pro tanto morally wrong to kill patients who are universally and irreversibly disabled, because they have no abilities to lose. Applied to vital organ transplantation, this account undermines the dead donor rule and shows how current practices are compatible with morality.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100351 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
A matter of right or wrong: Divisive attributes of moralized science and technology attitudes.
Public Underst Sci
January 2025
Rowan University, USA.
In recent years, scholars have theorized that one factor enflaming public divides over science and technology is moralization: an individual's perception that their position on an issue is rooted in fundamental moral right and wrong. In this article, I provide evidence for this proposition across five pre-registered hypotheses about the divisive attributes of moralized attitudes in the context of science and technology. Using public opinion data in the United States on three issues-combating climate change, developing gene editing therapies for humans, and labeling genetically modified food-this study demonstrates that moralized attitudes have the potential to exacerbate resistance to scientific evidence and hostility between those with opposing positions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA reparatory account of health inequities.
Med Law Rev
January 2025
Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Colonialism has left biological and social legacies that damage health. The resulting racialized health inequities re-enact past harms and are a profound social injustice. In response, this article brings together reparatory justice and health equity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFConscientious objection: a global health perspective.
BMJ Glob Health
December 2024
Global Bioethics Collaborative, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Conscientious objection is a critical topic that has been sparsely discussed from a global health perspective, despite its special relevance to our inherently diverse field. In this Analysis paper, we argue that blanket prohibitions of a specific type of non-discriminatory conscientious objection are unjustified in the global health context. We begin both by introducing a nuanced account of conscience that is grounded in moral psychology and by providing an overview of discriminatory and non-discriminatory forms of objection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMoral injury appraisals and PTSD symptoms in treatment-seeking refugees: a latent profile analysis.
Eur J Psychotraumatol
December 2024
ARQ Centrum'45, Diemen, the Netherlands.
Refugees flee from countries due to war, violence, or persecution and are often exposed to potentially traumatic events (PTEs). Furthermore, they might encounter situations where they are compelled to act contrary to their moral codes or witness others acting morally wrong. Consequently, they are at risk to not only develop symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but also moral injury (MI).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIdentity categories and the dilemma of calling police about family violence.
Br J Soc Psychol
January 2025
University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK.
The under-reporting of family violence is a global problem. Multiple barriers to help-seeking have been identified, including some associated with social identities like race, age and gender. This discursive psychology study examines identity and help-seeking in social interaction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!