Objective: Bipolar I disorder is highly heritable, but endophenotypes of the disorder mediating genetic risk are only beginning to be defined. The authors investigate state- and trait-related neural mechanisms related to motivation in euthymic bipolar patients and unaffected first-degree relatives of bipolar patients to define the status of motivational processing as a neural systems-level endophenotype.

Method: Our study comprised two samples; the first consisted of 19 euthymic bipolar patients and 19 matched comparison subjects, and the second included 22 relatives and 22 matched comparison subjects. Motivational processing was assessed with a probabilistic reversal learning task during event-related functional MRI. Data were analyzed using a region-of-interest approach restricting analysis to the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex, the amygdala, the anterior cingulate cortex, and the striatum.

Results: The authors observed increased activation in response to reward and reward reversal contingencies in the left medial orbitofrontal cortex in patients with bipolar disorder and in the right medial orbitofrontal cortex in their relatives. Activation of the amygdala in response to reward reversal was increased in patients and relatives. In response to reward, activation of the amygdala was greater only in relatives, but there was a significant negative correlation between medication and amygdala activation in patients.

Conclusions: These results identify increased activity of the orbitofrontal cortex and the amygdala, related to heightened sensitivity to reward and deficient prediction error signal, as a candidate endophenotype of bipolar disorder. The results support a role of motivational processing in the risk architecture of bipolar disorder and identify a new systems-level therapeutic target for the illness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11050711DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bipolar disorder
20
orbitofrontal cortex
16
medial orbitofrontal
12
bipolar patients
12
motivational processing
12
response reward
12
amygdala activation
8
bipolar
8
endophenotype bipolar
8
euthymic bipolar
8

Similar Publications

Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying bipolar disorder (BD) and its treatment are still poorly understood. Here we examined the role of adaptations in risk-taking using a reward-guided decision-making task. We recruited volunteers with high (n = 40) scores on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire, MDQ, suspected of high risk for bipolar disorder and those with low-risk scores (n = 37).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bayesian Optimization Of NeuroStimulation (BOONStim).

Brain Stimul

January 2025

Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Bipolar Disorder (BD) is a complex disease. It is heterogeneous, both at the phenotypic and genetic level, although the extent and impact of this heterogeneity is not fully understood. One way to assess this heterogeneity is to look for patterns in the subphenotype data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Limited research explores mental health disparities between individuals in sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations and cisgender heterosexual (non-SGM) populations using national-level data.

Objective: To explore mental health disparities between SGM and non-SGM populations across sexual orientation, sex assigned at birth, and gender identity within the All of Us Research Program.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cross-sectional study used survey data and linked electronic health records of eligible All of Us Research Program participants from May 31, 2017, to June 30, 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Silence as epistemic agency in mania.

Med Health Care Philos

January 2025

Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Silence is a byword for socially imposed harm in the burgeoning literature on epistemic injustice in psychiatry. While some silence is harmful and should be broken, this understanding of silence is untenably simplistic. Crucially, it neglects the possibility that silence can also play a constructive epistemic role in the lives of people with mental illness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!