A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Relation between the dimensions and intraluminal pressure of the pharyngoesophageal segment and tracheoesophageal voice and speech proficiency. | LitMetric

Background: The objective of the present study was to relate the dimensions and the intraluminal pressure of the pharyngoesophageal segment (PES) to the voice and speech proficiency of total laryngectomees with a tracheoesophageal prosthesis (TEP).

Methods: Twenty total laryngectomees with secondary TEP insertion underwent evaluation of voice and speech, manometry, and videofluoroscopy.

Results: Most laryngectomees (65%) were moderate speakers. The poorer speakers presented a lower intraluminal pressure in the PES at rest (4.44 mmHg) and a higher value (40.46 mmHg) during phonation. Good speakers presented a significant difference in the anteroposterior distance between prominence of the PES and the posterior pharyngeal wall (PPES-PPW) in the rest (6.09 mm) to phonation (3.24 mm).

Conclusions: The poorer speakers presented a lower intraluminal pressure in the PES at rest and a higher value during phonation compared with moderate speakers. Good speakers showed a significant difference in the PPES-PPW dimension.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.22921DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intraluminal pressure
16
voice speech
12
speakers presented
12
dimensions intraluminal
8
pressure pharyngoesophageal
8
pharyngoesophageal segment
8
speech proficiency
8
total laryngectomees
8
moderate speakers
8
poorer speakers
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!