Although work-family research has mushroomed over the past several decades, an implementation gap persists in putting work-family research into practice. Because of this, work-family researchers have not made a significant impact in improving the lives of employees relative to the amount of research that has been conducted. The goal of this article is to clarify areas where implementation gaps between work-family research and practice are prevalent, discuss the importance of reducing these gaps, and make the case that both better and different research should be conducted. We recommend several alternative but complementary actions for the work-family researcher: (a) work with organizations to study their policy and practice implementation efforts, (b) focus on the impact of rapid technological advances that are blurring work-family boundaries, (c) conduct research to empower the individual to self-manage the work-family interface, and (d) engage in advocacy and collaborative policy research to change institutional contexts and break down silos. Increased partnerships between industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology practitioners and researchers from many industries and disciplines could break down silos that we see as limiting development of the field.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3255172PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01353.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

work-family
8
work-family practice
8
break silos
8
work-family finally
4
finally impact
4
impact organizations
4
organizations work-family
4
work-family mushroomed
4
mushroomed decades
4
decades implementation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!