Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of adding insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin to existing oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) regimens in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Design: Pooled analysis of data from five randomized controlled trials with similar designs.
Setting: Three hundred forty-two centers in more than 30 countries worldwide.
Participants: Randomly selected individuals aged ≤ 80 with a body mass index ≤ 40 kg/m(2) and a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level of 7.5% to 12.0%.
Measurements: Fixed- and random-effects models were used to compare outcomes after 24 or 28 weeks of treatment (insulin glargine, n = 1,441; NPH insulin, n = 1,254) according to age (≥65, n = 604 vs < 65, n = 2,091) and age based on treatment (e.g., ≥65 receiving insulin glargine vs NPH insulin). Outcomes included change in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin dose, and hypoglycemia incidence and event rates.
Results: At end point, participants aged 65 and older receiving insulin glargine had greater reductions in HbA1c and FBG than those receiving similar doses of NPH insulin. In contrast, for participants younger than 65, there were no statistically significant differences in reductions in HbA1c or FBG between insulin glargine and NPH insulin. Daytime hypoglycemia rates were similar in all groups, although the rates of nocturnal symptomatic and severe hypoglycemia were lower with insulin glargine than NPH insulin.
Conclusion: Addition of insulin glargine to oral antidiabetic drugs in older adults with poor glycemic control may have modestly better glycemic benefits than adding NPH insulin, with low risk of hypoglycemia.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03773.x | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Cell-Based Assays to Detect Innate Immune Response Modulating Impurities: Application to Biosimilar Insulin.
AAPS J
December 2024
Laboratory of Immunology, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Research Division-IV, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Characterizing and mitigating factors that impact product immunogenicity can aid in risk assessment and/or managing risk following manufacturing changes. For follow-on products that have the same indication, patient population, and active product ingredient, the residual immunogenicity risk resides predominantly on differences in product and process related impurities. Characterizing differences in innate immune modulating impurities (IIRMI), which could act as adjuvants by activating local antigen presenting cells (APCs), can inform the immunogenicity risk assessment potentially reducing the need for clinical trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAUGMENTed Real-World Data Enhances Comparative Efficacy Between Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec with Dosing Guide App Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U300 in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes.
Diabetes Ther
December 2024
Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Introduction: ONWARDS 5 evaluated the effectiveness and safety of insulin icodec (icodec) titrated with a dosing guide app (icodec with app) versus once-daily insulin analogs in insulin-naive adults with type 2 diabetes. The insulin glargine U300 (glargine U300) stratum was too small to enable a robust post hoc efficacy comparison. Augmentation methodology was applied to increase the glargine U300 group size using real-world data (RWD), to facilitate efficacy comparisons of icodec with app versus glargine U300, and to demonstrate the potential of the augmentation methodology to strengthen underpowered treatment comparisons (AUGMENT study).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEfficacy and safety of switching to insulin glargine 300 U/mL in people with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin in China: A post hoc subpopulation analysis of the INITIATION study.
Diabetes Obes Metab
December 2024
Sanofi Investment Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) in people with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D) switching from another basal insulin (BI).
Materials And Methods: INITIATION was an interventional, single-arm, phase IV study conducted in China. In this post hoc subpopulation analysis, the efficacy and safety of switching to Gla-300 was investigated in individuals with uncontrolled T2D (HbA1c 7.
Once-weekly tirzepatide versus once-daily basal insulin in managing type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Endocr Pract
December 2024
Department of Endocrinology, CEDAR Superspeciality Healthcare, Dwarka, New Delhi-110075, India.
Objective: No meta-analysis has been published comparing the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus once-daily basal insulins in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs (OADs). This meta-analysis was conducted to address this knowledge gap.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving subjects with T2D inadequately controlled with OADs and receiving tirzepatide in intervention arm and basal insulins in control arm as add-on therapy were searched throughout the electronic databases.
Pharmacological characteristics of once-weekly insulin icodec in Japanese individuals with type 1 diabetes.
J Diabetes Investig
December 2024
Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Introduction: Insulin icodec is a basal insulin designed for once-weekly administration. This study assessed the pharmacological properties of icodec in Japanese individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
Materials And Methods: In a randomized, open-label, crossover study, 24 Japanese individuals with T1D (20-64 years; glycated hemoglobin ≤9.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!