AI Article Synopsis
Article Abstract
Objective: Compare auditory performance of Hybrid and standard cochlear implant users with psychoacoustic measures of spectral and temporal sensitivity and correlate with measures of clinical benefit.
Study Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Tertiary academic medical center.
Patients: Hybrid cochlear implant users between 12 and 33 months after implantation. Hybrid recipients had preservation of low-frequency hearing.
Interventions: Administration of psychoacoustic, music perception, and speech reception in noise tests.
Main Outcome Measures: Performance on spectral-ripple discrimination, temporal modulation detection, Schroeder-phase discrimination, Clinical Assessment of Music Perception, and speech reception in steady-state noise tests.
Results: Clinical Assessment of Music Perception pitch performance at 262 Hz was significantly better in Hybrid users compared with standard implant controls. There was a near significant difference on speech reception in steady-state noise. Surprisingly, neither Schroeder-phase discrimination at 2 frequencies nor temporal modulation detection thresholds across a range of frequencies revealed any advantage in Hybrid users. This contrasts with spectral-ripple measures that were significantly better in the Hybrid group. The spectral-ripple advantage was preserved even when using only residual hearing.
Conclusion: These preliminary data confirm existing data demonstrating that residual low-frequency acoustic hearing is advantageous for pitch perception. Results also suggest that clinical benefits enjoyed by Hybrid recipients are due to improved spectral discrimination provided by the residual hearing. No evidence indicated that residual hearing provided temporal information beyond that provided by electric stimulation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259253 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318241b6d3 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Can a Cochlear Implant Be Used as an Electrical Impedance Tomography Device?
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng
January 2025
Bioengineering, Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
The imaging of the live cochlea is a challenging task. Regardless of the quality of images obtained from modern clinical imaging techniques, the internal structures of the cochlea mainly remain obscured. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a safe, low-cost alternative medical imaging technique with applications in various clinical scenarios.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEvaluating the Effect of Various Pure Tone Averages on Cochlear Implant Candidacy Screening.
Laryngoscope
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Objective: To provide evidence to use an extended frequency pure tone average to screen for cochlear implant evaluation candidates as recommended by the American Cochlear Implant Alliance. Additionally, to determine whether traditional low frequency, high or low frequency, high frequency, or extended frequency pure tone average most accurately predicts cochlear implant candidates based on speech perception scores from aided AzBio sentence testing or aided consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) testing.
Method: Adults from a tertiary care center who completed aided sentence testing during cochlear implant evaluation between 2014 and 2024 were assessed.
Intraoperative impedance and ECAP results in cochlear implant recipients with inner ear malformations and normal cochlear anatomy: a retrospective analysis.
Acta Otolaryngol
January 2025
Department of Audiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Background: The intraoperative measurements are essential steps in cochlear implant (CI) surgery for confirming correct electrode placement.
Objectives: To examine the intraoperative impedance and electrically evoked action potential (ECAP) measurement results of cochlear implant (CI) users with normal cochlear anatomy (NCA) and to compare them with CI users with inner ear malformations (IEM).
Material And Methods: This retrospective study included intraoperative data of 300 ears from 258 individuals using Medel and Cochlear (Nucleus) CI devices.
Establishment of reference audiometric norms for the elderly population: A community-based study on mean and median hearing thresholds.
Heliyon
January 2025
Information Management Office, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Background: This investigation quantifies the mean and median hearing thresholds and assesses the prevalence of age-related hearing loss within the senior population of Taipei.
Methods: In a substantive geriatric assessment supported by government initiative, 1696 individuals from a community hospital partook in this cross-sectional study (2016-2018). Detailed audiometric evaluations logged pure-tone thresholds across critical frequencies (0.
Pupillometry and perceived listening effort for cochlear implant users-a comparison of three speech-in-noise tests.
Int J Audiol
January 2025
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Objective: Measuring listening effort using pupillometry is challenging in cochlear implant (CI) users. We assess three validated speech tests (Matrix, LIST, and DIN) to identify the optimal speech material for measuring peak-pupil-dilation (PPD) in CI users as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
Design: Speech tests were administered in quiet and two noisy conditions, namely at the speech recognition threshold (0 dB re SRT), i.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!