Introduction: Use of cigarette price-minimizing strategies may reduce the effectiveness of cigarette excise taxes on the prevalence of smoking. We examined the use of different price-minimizing strategies by smokers and their associations with subsequent smoking behaviors.
Methods: Seven hundred eighteen current smokers from the Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey Cohort Study provided information on the use of six different price-minimizing strategies in 2009; 602 of them were resurveyed in 2010 to assess their smoking behavior. Logistic regression was used to assess the effects of use of each strategy, use of at least one strategy, and the number of strategies used on quit smoking, attempted to quit, or cut back on cigarette consumption.
Results: Overall, 78% of participants used at least one price-minimizing strategy in 2009 to save money on cigarettes. About 53% reported buying from less expensive places, 49% used coupons or promotions, 42% purchased by the carton, and 34% changed to a cheaper brand. Participants' characteristics differed somewhat by strategy. Participants who reported buying by the carton were less likely to attempt to quit smoking and cut back on cigarette consumption subsequently; those who used more strategies were less likely to cut back on their cigarette consumption.
Conclusions: Use of cigarette price-minimizing strategies is common among smokers and appears to hinder smokers from attempting to quit and reducing cigarette consumption. Prohibiting the use of coupons and promotions may uphold the effect of cigarette taxes to reduce the prevalence of smoking.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr300 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
The effect of tobacco tax increase on price-minimizing tobacco purchasing behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Addiction
November 2024
The NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Article Synopsis
- Tobacco product excise taxes effectively reduce consumption, but consumers often respond to these taxes by engaging in price-minimizing behaviors (PMBs), such as buying cheaper brands or roll-your-own tobacco.
- A systematic review of 68 studies found that tax increases lead to a rise in PMBs, especially among low-income consumers with higher nicotine dependence, who are more likely to buy lower-priced options.
- Findings indicate that while PMBs are influenced by tax increases, the link between illicit purchases and overall smoking cessation is less clear, suggesting that PMBs vary significantly based on the regulatory environment.
Price minimizing behaviours by smokers in Europe (2006-20): evidence from the International Tobacco Control Project.
Eur J Public Health
November 2022
Department of Health Promotion (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Background: Effectiveness of tobacco taxation can be undermined through smokers applying price-minimizing behaviours rather than quitting or reducing consumption. Common price-minimizing strategies are buying cheaper tobacco [discount brands or roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco], bulk buying and cross-border purchasing. This study analyses trends in and factors associated with such behaviours in four European countries from 2006 to 2020.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPotential revenue from taxing e-cigarettes and comparison of annual costs of daily e-cigarette use versus daily cigarette smoking among South African adults.
Tob Induc Dis
January 2021
School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Article Synopsis
- The study compared the annual costs of using e-cigarettes versus traditional cigarettes in South Africa and estimated potential tax revenue from e-cigarettes if taxed as proposed by the government.
- E-cigarette costs ranged from ZAR 8,574.69 to ZAR 19,780.83 per year, while traditional cigarettes cost about ZAR 6,693, showing e-cigarettes could be more expensive overall.
- Projections indicate revenue from taxing e-cigarettes at 75% of the cigarette tax could reach ZAR 2.20 billion, suggesting that a higher tax could limit youth access while encouraging smokers to switch to less harmful alternatives.
Does every US smoker bear the same cigarette tax?
Addiction
October 2014
Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Aims: To evaluate state cigarette excise tax pass-through rates for selected price-minimizing strategies.
Design: Multivariate regression analysis of current smokers from a stratified, national, dual-frame telephone survey.
Setting: United States.
Minnesota smokers' perceived helpfulness of 2009 federal tobacco tax increase in assisting smoking cessation: a prospective cohort study.
BMC Public Health
October 2013
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 South Second Street # 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
Background: The cost of cigarettes has been cited as a motivating factor for smokers to quit smoking, and a cigarette tax increase is an effective way to increase the cost of cigarettes. Scholars have suggested that smokers may see cigarette tax increases as commitment devices to help them quit smoking. Little is known about whether smokers actually think cigarette tax increases help them quit, and whether this perception predicts subsequent smoking cessation behaviors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!