Assessing genetic polymorphisms using DNA extracted from cells present in saliva samples.

BMC Med Res Methodol

Department of Medical Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Pathobiochemistry, Semmelweis University, Tuzolto utca, Budapest, Hungary.

Published: December 2011

AI Article Synopsis

  • Advances in DNA extraction from saliva have shown that even small volumes (as low as 0.10 ml) can yield high-quality DNA for genetic analysis.
  • Five studies explored how factors like sample volume, collection devices, and storage conditions affected DNA quality and recovery from saliva samples.
  • Results indicated that while certain devices retained significant DNA, methods to recover this DNA still provided accurate genetic results, and environmental conditions had minimal effects on DNA integrity.

Article Abstract

Background: Technical advances following the Human Genome Project revealed that high-quality and -quantity DNA may be obtained from whole saliva samples. However, usability of previously collected samples and the effects of environmental conditions on the samples during collection have not been assessed in detail. In five studies we document the effects of sample volume, handling and storage conditions, type of collection device, and oral sampling location, on quantity, quality, and genetic assessment of DNA extracted from cells present in saliva.

Methods: Saliva samples were collected from ten adults in each study. Saliva volumes from .10-1.0 ml, different saliva collection devices, sampling locations in the mouth, room temperature storage, and multiple freeze-thaw cycles were tested. One representative single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the catechol-0-methyltransferase gene (COMT rs4680) and one representative variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) in the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR: serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region) were selected for genetic analyses.

Results: The smallest tested whole saliva volume of .10 ml yielded, on average, 1.43 ± .77 μg DNA and gave accurate genotype calls in both genetic analyses. The usage of collection devices reduced the amount of DNA extracted from the saliva filtrates compared to the whole saliva sample, as 54-92% of the DNA was retained on the device. An "adhered cell" extraction enabled recovery of this DNA and provided good quality and quantity DNA. The DNA from both the saliva filtrates and the adhered cell recovery provided accurate genotype calls. The effects of storage at room temperature (up to 5 days), repeated freeze-thaw cycles (up to 6 cycles), and oral sampling location on DNA extraction and on genetic analysis from saliva were negligible.

Conclusions: Whole saliva samples with volumes of at least .10 ml were sufficient to extract good quality and quantity DNA. Using 10 ng of DNA per genotyping reaction, the obtained samples can be used for more than one hundred candidate gene assays. When saliva is collected with an absorbent device, most of the nucleic acid content remains in the device, therefore it is advisable to collect the device separately for later genetic analyses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3267685PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-170DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

saliva samples
16
dna
12
dna extracted
12
saliva
12
extracted cells
8
dna saliva
8
oral sampling
8
sampling location
8
collection devices
8
room temperature
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!