A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming.

Behav Res Methods

Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK.

Published: September 2012

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Acronyms are an idiosyncratic part of our everyday vocabulary. Research in word processing has used acronyms as a tool to answer fundamental questions such as the nature of the word superiority effect (WSE) or which is the best way to account for word-reading processes. In this study, acronym naming was assessed by looking at the influence that a number of variables known to affect mainstream word processing has had in acronym naming. The nature of the effect of these factors on acronym naming was examined using a multilevel regression analysis. First, 146 acronyms were described in terms of their age of acquisition, bigram and trigram frequencies, imageability, number of orthographic neighbors, frequency, orthographic and phonological length, print-to-pronunciation patterns, and voicing characteristics. Naming times were influenced by lexical and sublexical factors, indicating that acronym naming is a complex process affected by more variables than those previously considered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7100480PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0175-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acronym naming
20
word processing
8
naming
6
acronym
5
normative study
4
acronyms
4
study acronyms
4
acronyms acronym
4
naming acronyms
4
acronyms idiosyncratic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!