Second opinion is a decision-support tool for ratification or modification of a suggested treatment, by another physician. Second opinion may have a critical influence on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. The patient can benefit from treatment optimization and avoid unnecessary risks. The physician can benefit from less exposure to legal claims, and healthcare organizations can benefit from increased treatment, quality assurance and costs saving from unnecessary surgery and treatments. Nevertheless, injudicious use of this tool can provoke unnecessary medical costs. In recent years, many patients prefer to seek a second opinion on their disease and available treatments. Private and public insurance companies are trying to control surgery costs by urging and even demanding a second opinion before surgery. Although second opinions are common in medical practice, relatively little is known on this subject. Most of the studies reviewed in this article evaluated the clinical benefit of second opinions, the reasons patients seek a second opinion and the characteristics of these patients, as well as technological interventions to promote second opinions, and ethical or legal issues related to second opinions. Yet, there are opportunities for further studies about physicians attitudes and barriers towards second opinions, their effect on patient-physician communication and cost-effectiveness analyses of second opinions. Due to the relevance of second opinions for public heath, this review aims to summarize the current research on second opinions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
PLoS One
January 2025
National Institute of Public Health of Mexico, Center for Evaluation and Surveys Research, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Introduction: Tackling the inertia of growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires changes in how antibiotics are prescribed and utilized. The monitoring of antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals is a critical component in optimizing antibiotic use. Point prevalence surveys (PPSs) enable the surveillance of antibiotic prescribing at the patient level in small hospitals that lack the resources to establish antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimers Dement
December 2024
Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Background: How clinicians discuss, document, and diagnose health concerns within a visit shapes patient perceptions of their health conditions. Undiagnosed hearing loss among older adults with dementia or cognitive concerns may exacerbate neuropsychiatric symptoms and care challenges. This study investigates clinician documentation of hearing concerns and whether documentation, diagnosis, and referral vary for older adults with dementia/cognitive concerns.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDan Med J
November 2024
Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Aalborg University Hospital.
Introduction: Shared decision-making (SDM) enables individually tailored treatment plans. This survey explored patients' and surgeons' perceptions of SDM in consultations on thyroid nodules. Furthermore, we aimed to explore possible discrepancies between the groups, identify factors influencing patients' perceived levels of SDM and evaluate decisional regret.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Appl Lab Med
January 2025
Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Background: Referral (send-out) laboratories support clinical needs but may cause issues for hospitals or health systems related to regulations and governance, specimen logistics, test result availability, and cost and reimbursement. The use of a "miscellaneous" referral test order can increase risks of specimen collection or processing errors, result delays, and repeat testing.
Methods: We established an approved referral laboratory test list and a digital form for providers to request new referral tests.
J Healthc Manag
January 2025
Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Goal: The objective of this study was to better understand how healthcare systems' unit- and system-level leaders perceive and experience moral distress consultation services, including their utility, efficacy, and sustainability.
Methods: A multimethod design was conducted in tandem across two academic medical centers with longstanding and active moral distress consultation services. Moral distress data for healthcare providers participating in moral distress consultation were collected.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!