Introducing a knee endoprosthesis model increases risk of early revision surgery.

Clin Orthop Relat Res

Centre for Health and Social Economics CHESS, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00270, Helsinki, Finland.

Published: June 2012

Background: New equipment and techniques often are used in clinical practice, occasionally without evidence of effectiveness and safety.

Questions/purposes: We asked whether the stage of introduction of an endoprosthesis model for TKA affected the risk of early revision.

Methods: We studied mandatory registry data from all centers in Finland (n = 69) that performed TKAs for primary osteoarthritis between 1998 and 2004. Of the total of 23,707 patients (28,760 TKAs), 22,551 patients (27,105 TKAs) had a followup of 5 years; we excluded longer followup from the analysis as subsequent revisions might result from wear rather than early technical failures. We used proportional hazards modeling for calculating the hazard ratios for the first 15 operations and subsequent increments of numbers of operations while adjusting for potentially confounding variables.

Results: For the first 15 operations with a new endoprosthesis, the risk was elevated (hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.91). Absolute risk increase of early revision for the first 15 patients was 1.7% (95% confidence interval, 0.7-2.7). The risk was not increased as the numbers of TKAs incrementally performed increased.

Conclusions: Our data show an increased risk of early revision surgery for the first patients obtaining a knee endoprosthesis model previously unused in the hospital. Patients should be informed if there is a plan to introduce a new model of endoprosthesis in the hospital and offered the possibility to choose a conventional endoprosthesis instead. Although introducing potentially better endoprostheses is important, there is a need for managed introduction of new technology.

Level Of Evidence: Level I, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3348304PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2171-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endoprosthesis model
12
risk early
12
early revision
12
knee endoprosthesis
8
revision surgery
8
95% confidence
8
confidence interval
8
endoprosthesis
6
risk
6
early
5

Similar Publications

The best treatment method for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures (ROIFs) is still under debate. Our team designed the modified proximal femoral nail (MPFN) specially for treating such fractures. The objective of this research was to introduce the MPFN device and compare the biomechanical properties with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and InterTAN nail via finite element modelling.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Organoid technology, as an innovative approach in biomedicine, exhibits promising prospects in disease modeling, pharmaceutical screening, regenerative medicine, and oncology research. However, the use of tumor-derived Matrigel as the primary method for culturing organoids has significantly impeded the clinical translation of organoid technology due to concerns about potential risks, batch-to-batch instability, and high costs. To address these challenges, this study innovatively introduced a photo-crosslinkable hydrogel made from a porcine small intestinal submucosa decellularized matrix (SIS), fish collagen (FC), and methacrylate gelatin (GelMA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The study aimed to evaluate a newly designed semicircular implant for the fixation of Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. To determine its strength and clinical applicability, the new implant was compared biomechanically with conventional fixation methods, such as lateral locking plate fixation and a plate combined with cerclage wires. : Fifteen synthetic femur models were used in this biomechanical study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cartilage repair remains a critical challenge in orthopaedic medicine due to the tissue's limited self-healing ability, contributing to degenerative joint conditions such as osteoarthritis (OA). In response, regenerative medicine has developed advanced therapeutic strategies, including cell-based therapies, gene editing, and bioengineered scaffolds, to promote cartilage regeneration and restore joint function. This narrative review aims to explore the latest developments in cartilage repair techniques, focusing on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy, gene-based interventions, and biomaterial innovations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mechanical analysis of 3D printed dental restorations manufactured using different resins and validation with FEM analysis.

BMC Oral Health

January 2025

Clinic of Masticatory Disorders and Dental Biomaterials, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the wear and fracture resistance of single crowns produced from newly developed 3D printer resins used to produce permanent crowns and currently used composite CAD/CAM discs, after being thermomechanically aged in a chewing simulator.

Materials And Methods: A total of 112 stainless steel die models simulating mandibular left first molars were produced, 8 for each group. Single crowns were produced from 3 different discs (Grandio Voco [GR], breCAM HIPC [HC], and Shofu HC [SF]) by CAD/CAM milling method and manufactured from from 4 different permanent composite resins (Nexdent C&B MFH [ND], Permanent Bridge Saremco [PB], VarseoSmile Crownplus [VSC], and Şenertek P-Crown [PC]) using the 3D printing method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!