Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The authors issued some recommendations for assessment of new radiopharmaceuticals (RP) at the stage of clinical trials. The most decisive thing is to determine the clinico-diagnostic efficacy of a radiopharmaceutical and its safety. Direct extrapolation of the results of experimental investigation of biodistribution of labeled compounds on man was shown to be fraught with serious errors. Differences in RP pharmacokinetics necessitate a planned, methodologically correct and clinically substantiated study of a RP in selected groups of patients taking into account the functional purpose of a drug. The assessment of RP quality is based upon a study of functional suitableness resulting from pharmacokinetic data and the determination of optimum methodological conditions and safety of a new RP, including the calculation of radiation a patient is exposed to during a diagnostic procedure. The stages of clinical trials are given in detail, their unification is aimed at raising their quality and improved clinical assessment of a RP.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!