AI Article Synopsis

  • Indels (insertions and deletions) and nucleotide substitutions are important for genetic evolution, with a noted deletional bias in many species, though not universally in mammals like humans and mice.
  • Research focused on six mammalian branches revealed that strong deletional bias appears only in the ancestral rodent branch, leading to an estimated 2.5% sequence loss in mouse and rat ancestors.
  • It was found that negative selection is more effective against amino acid insertions than deletions, with this selection pressure being stronger in rodents compared to primates, which aligns with the larger population sizes in rodents.

Article Abstract

Insertions and deletions (indels), together with nucleotide substitutions, are major drivers of sequence evolution. An excess of deletions over insertions in genomic sequences-the so-called deletional bias-has been reported in a wide range of species, including mammals. However, this bias has not been found in the coding sequences of some mammalian species, such as human and mouse. To determine the strength of the deletional bias in mammals, and the influence of mutation and selection, we have quantified indels in both neutrally evolving noncoding sequences and protein-coding sequences, in six mammalian branches: human, macaque, ancestral primate, mouse, rat, and ancestral rodent. The results obtained with an improved algorithm for the placement of insertions in multiple alignments, Prank(+F), indicate that contrary to previous results, the only mammalian branch with a strong deletional bias is the rodent ancestral branch. We estimate that such a bias has resulted in an ~2.5% sequence loss of mammalian syntenic region in the ancestor of the mouse and rat. Further, a comparison of coding and noncoding sequences shows that negative selection is acting more strongly against mutations generating amino acid insertions than against mutations resulting in amino acid deletions. The strength of selection against indels is found to be higher in the rodent branches than in the primate branches, consistent with the larger effective population sizes of the rodents.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290783PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.121897.111DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sequences mammalian
8
deletional bias
8
noncoding sequences
8
mouse rat
8
amino acid
8
sequence shortening
4
rodent
4
shortening rodent
4
rodent ancestor
4
insertions
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!