The results for 143 cases of ureteral stones treated by EDAP LT01 were analyzed concerning stone location, ureteral manipulation and treatment position. The ureter was divided into six segments: ureteropelvic junction (UPJ), proximal ureter (PU1 and PU2), mid-ureter (MU), distal ureter (D1 and D2). The overall fracturization rate (FR) was 72%, as detailed below: UPJ (89%, 26/29), PU1 (86%, 13/15), PU2-MU (62%, 15/24), DU1 (59%, 25/42), DU2 (72%, 24/33). Anesthesia or iv sedation were never used for PEL. 24% of the patients underwent retrograde ureteral manipulation (in situ/push back = 108/35). For PU1, the FR was twice as high after retrograde manipulation (in situ/push back = 5/8). For PU2 and MU, the supine position was most common. For UPJ and PU1, it was often better to have the patient lie on his side. For DU1 and DU2, a prone position was necessary. For all stones in DU1, the bladder must be well filled; the FR was higher in DU2 than in DU1. DU2 stones appeared to adhere to the bladder wall or were intravesical (stone in the meatus). The stone-free rate for successfully manipulated ureteral calculi (3 month's follow-up) was 93% (27/29). The stone-free rate for in situ stones at 3 months was 94% (70/74). Extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy combined with stone manipulation is highly efficient in the management of UPJ, PU1 and DU2 stones. The success rate of in situ PEL improves after the operator becomes skilled with the procedure. The advantages of the EDAP LT01 are the absence of pain, no need for anesthesia, and the mobility of the shock wave unit.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Aim: To evaluate the efficiency of the drug phytolysin (capsules) in the prevention of complications after extracorporeal lithotripsy.
Materials And Methods: A total of 15 patients diagnosed with urolithiasis and chronic pyelonephritis in the latent phase were treated. The predominant localization of radiopaque stones no larger than 20 mm in size was the collecting system.
BJU Int
October 2023
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) using a narrow focus or wide focus for renal stones.
Patients And Methods: A double-blind randomised trial included adult patients with a solitary radio-opaque renal pelvic stone of 1-2 cm. Patients were randomised into two groups: narrow-focus (2 mm) SWL and wide-focus (8 mm) SWL.
Eur Urol Focus
September 2022
2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. Electronic address:
Context: Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) shows clear associated benefits for urolithiasis patients.
Objective: To identify and classify SWL complications according to modified Clavien-Dindo grading system while assessing the effect of different patient characteristics, stone parameters, types of lithotripters, and lithotripsy techniques.
Evidence Acquisition: Literature was reviewed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement.
Ultrasonics
April 2020
INSERM, LabTAU, F-69003 Lyon, France.
This work focuses on the evaluation of a type of piezoelectric lithotripter with similar dimensions of a commercial lithotripter and composed of either 3 or 4 large lens focused piezoelectric transducers set either in a confocal coplanar C-shape or a confocal spherical shape. Each transducer is made with a 92 mm diameter 220 kHz flat piezoelectric ceramic disc and a 3D printed acoustic lens. Both confocal setups pressure field were measured with a fiber optic hydrophone, and in vitro fragmentations of 13 mm diameter and 14 mm length cylindrical model stones were done in a 2 mm mesh basket.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!