Objective: To examine the contents of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) by mapping it to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Methods: Each of the 30 scoreable items in the MPAI-4 was mapped to the most precise ICF categories.

Results: All 30 items could be mapped to components and categories in the ICF. A total of 88 meaningful concepts were identified. There were, on average, 2.9 meaningful concepts per item, and 65% of all concepts could be mapped. Items in the Ability and Adjustment subscales mapped to categories in both the Body Functions and Activity/Participation components of the ICF, whereas all except 1 in the Participation subscale were to categories in the Activity/Participation component. The items could also be mapped to 34 (13%) of the 258 Environmental Factors in the ICF.

Conclusion: This mapping provides better definition through more concrete examples (as listed in the ICF) of the types of body functions, activities, and participation indicators that are represented by the 30 scoreable MPAI-4 items. This may assist users throughout the world in understanding the intent of each item, and support further development and the possibility to report results in the form of an ICF categorical profile, making it universally interpretable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0897DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mayo-portland adaptability
8
adaptability inventory
8
international classification
8
classification functioning
8
functioning disability
8
disability health
8
items mapped
8
meaningful concepts
8
body functions
8
items
5

Similar Publications

Role and Outcomes of Supported Community Living Programs in Post-Hospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Programs.

J Head Trauma Rehabil

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Director of Performance Improvement and Quality Management (Mr Logan), Analytics (Mr Walters), On With Life, Ankeny, Iowa; Foundation to Advance Brain Rehabilitation (FABR), Wilmington, Delaware and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Drs Parrott and Malec), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; National Director of Outcomes, Collage Rehabilitation Partners, Paoli, Pennsylvania (Dr Altman); Quality Management, ReMed Recovery Care Centers, Paoli, Pennsylvania (Ms Eicher); Senior Director of Clinical Services, Bancroft NeuroRehab, Cherry Hill, New Jersey (Dr McGrath); Clinical Operations, Pate NeuroRehabilitation/Rehab Without Walls, Irving, Texas (Dr Salisbury); and Department of Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Malec).

Objectives: (1) To determine the proportion of participants admitted to supported community living (SCL) programs over the course of 5 years who improve, decline, or maintain functioning and community integration and (2) to examine the associations of time since injury, time in program, and age to their functional trajectory.

Setting: Data from SCL programs serving individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI).

Participants: 104 individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, or other ABI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Directed Content Analysis for Greatest Problems Among People With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil

January 2025

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX.

Objective: To characterize the greatest problem or need among individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), as compared with individuals with a history of other neurologic conditions, mental health conditions, and no history of neurologic or mental health conditions.

Design: A directed content analysis of open-text responses to a single online survey question using a framework guided by the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4.

Setting: Community.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluation of Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Outcomes With Quasi-Experimental Controls.

J Head Trauma Rehabil

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Foundation to Advance Brain Rehabilitation (FABR), and Psychiatry and Psychology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (Dr Parrott); Pate NeuroRehabilitation/Rehab Without Walls, Irving, Texas (Dr Salisbury); Collage Rehabilitation Partners, Paoli, Pennsylvania (Dr Altman); On With Life, Ankeny, Iowa (Mr Logan); Bancroft NeuroRehab, Cherry Hill, New Jersey (Dr McGrath); On With Life, Ankeny, Iowa (Mr Walters); Foundation to Advance Brain Rehabilitation (FABR); Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; and Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Malec).

Objective: To further evaluate, using quasi-experimental methodologies, posthospital brain injury rehabilitation outcomes described in an accompanying report of a large observational study ( n = 2120).

Setting: Data from Intensive Rehabilitation (IR: Residential Neurobehavioral, Residential Neurorehabilitation, Home and Community Neurorehabilitation, Day Treatment, Outpatient Neurorehabilitation) and Supported Living (SL) programs serving individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI).

Participants: Two hundred twenty-eight individuals with traumatic brain injury, stroke, or other ABI in propensity score analysis; 1344 in analysis by extent of recommended treatment completed (TC) rating.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Annually, around 480 individuals in Ireland receive a diagnosis of a primary brain tumour, which can negatively impact neurological and cognitive functions, highlighting a significant need for effective rehabilitation.* -
  • This study aims to assess the rehabilitation needs of brain tumour patients using a mixed methods approach, including quantitative assessments and qualitative interviews with patients and carers.* -
  • By understanding these needs, the research seeks to inform healthcare professionals and policymakers on how to better allocate resources and improve support services for those affected by brain tumours.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The purpose of the study was to identify whether the presence of a pre-injury psychiatric history, subacute post-concussive symptoms (PCS) and personality traits were predictive of less favorable social reintegration for 3 months following a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Method: A total of 76 patients with mTBI were included, and the presence of a pre-injury psychiatric history was identified from the medical chart. One-month post-accident, these patients completed the assessing personality traits and the to measure subacute PCS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!