Examining non-racial segregation: a micro-ecological approach.

Br J Soc Psychol

School of Psychology, University of Ulster, Londonderry, Northern Ireland.

Published: December 2012

A number of studies in both South Africa and the United States of America have indicated the presence of an 'informal' segregation that is active in everyday life spaces and which is resistant to changes in macro level social policy. This research has however been conducted in societies where segregation and division has been based on skin colour. We sought to adapt a micro-ecological technique for use in a non-racially segregated setting, in this case lecture theatres at a University in Northern Ireland. Using seat numbers to examine seating patterns we found that levels of segregation persisted throughout a semester. The success of this methodology in capturing this information has far-reaching implications for the future study of the micro-ecology of contact.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02080.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

examining non-racial
4
segregation
4
non-racial segregation
4
segregation micro-ecological
4
micro-ecological approach
4
approach number
4
number studies
4
studies south
4
south africa
4
africa united
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates how patient-clinician concordance (in race/ethnicity and gender) affects patients' trust in their healthcare providers.
  • Results show that nearly 60% of adults with a regular clinician trust their provider, with those having the same racial/ethnic background showing a higher trust level (62.4% vs 54.9%).
  • The study emphasizes the need for more Black and Latino clinicians and highlights that trust can still be built by all clinicians across diverse backgrounds, despite mixed results on gender concordance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The current study examined whether aversive and modern racists would convict Black defendants differently based on theoretical differences: aversive racists are egalitarian and discriminate when not reminded of their values, whereas modern racists do not espouse egalitarian values and discriminate when a non-racial reason exists to justify their behavior. Participants read a criminal trial where defendant race (Black vs. White), race salience (present vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Impact of Racial and Non-racial Discrimination on Health Behavior Change Among Visible Minority Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities

December 2022

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, M3083 Markin Hall, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, AB, T1K 3M4, Canada.

Introduction: Pre-pandemic health behavior has been put forward as a reason for excess COVID-19 infection and death in some racialized groups. At the same time, scholars have labeled racism the other pandemic and argued for its role in the adverse COVID-19 outcomes observed. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of discrimination on health behavior change among racialized adults in the early stages of the pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ambivalent white racial consciousness describes a push towards awareness about racial privilege and a simultaneous pull back from this knowledge into a more comfortable stance of denial. Twenty-nine White community members and undergraduate students participated in focus group discussions on race. Results indicated that participants expressed ambivalent racial consciousness when they talked about: what it means to be White, their non-racial identities, oppression, attributions for racial inequality, and interracial interactions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Examine the effect of perceived discrimination (both racial and non-racial) on the mental health of older African Americans and explore the buffering role of psychological well-being (purpose in life and self-acceptance).

Methods: Using an older African American subsample from the National Health Measurement Study (n = 397), multiple regression model by gender was used to estimate the effects of two types of discrimination (every day and lifetime) on SF-36 mental component and mediating role of two concepts of psychological well-being.

Results: With no gender difference on the everyday discrimination, older men experienced more lifetime discrimination than older women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!