Objectives: This study reports on mid-term safety and performance of valve-in-valve implantation as rescue strategy to overcome acute PPL after TAVI.

Background: Moderate to severe para-prosthetic leaks (PPL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have been described with both self-expandable and balloon-expandable device.

Methods: We analyzed data regarding patients who underwent valve-in-valve implantation, enrolled in the ongoing single-center prospective registry of TAVI, the Padova University REVALVing experience Registry. All procedures were performed by a totally percutaneous approach, using the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN).

Results: Out of 87 patients who underwent TAVI, six received valve-in-valve implantation because of persisting severe PPL, due to prosthesis malposition. In all patients, the second device was successfully deployed, with a significant reduction in aortic regurgitation: PPL was no longer appreciable in two of six patients, and it decreased from severe to mild or trivial in four patients. Four patients developed atrio-ventricular block requiring pace-maker implantation. At follow-up (6-24 months) two patients died, whereas no prosthesis-related death occurred. Transprosthesis pressure gradient, effective orifice area, and aortic regurgitation did not change at serial echocardiograms throughout the follow-up.

Conclusions: Valve-in-valve implantation using self-expandable bioprosthesis seems safe and highly effective to overcome severe PPL due to prosthesis malposition early after TAVI. Moreover, the implantation of two valves does not affect the performance of prosthesis at follow-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23181DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

valve-in-valve implantation
16
performance valve-in-valve
8
severe para-prosthetic
8
para-prosthetic leaks
8
transcatheter aortic
8
aortic valve
8
implantation
8
valve implantation
8
patients underwent
8
severe ppl
8

Similar Publications

Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) following surgical repair of the mitral valve poses a significant clinical challenge. Patients who have undergone surgery are typically at high risk for a second operation. This report details the case of a 54-year-old male who underwent aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair using a 34-ring, 14 years prior.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) era, implanting a larger-sized valve during the initial aortic valve replacement is important. For smaller aortic annuli, combining aortic annular and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) enlargement is essential. The Y-incision procedure helps achieve implantation of a 2-size larger valve.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedures are rapidly expanding, necessitating a more extensive stratification of patients with aortic stenosis. Especially in the high-risk group, some patients fail to derive optimal or any benefits from TAVI, leading to the risk of futile interventions. Despite consensus among several experts regarding the importance of recognizing and anticipating such interventions, the definition, and predictive criteria for futility in TAVI remain ambiguous.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Valve-related haemolysis is a known complication following prosthetic valve surgery. Haemolysis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been reported in some studies, all of which were non-critical. Data related to haemolysis associated with new-generation balloon-expandable valve (BEV) are scarce.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reintervention for Acute Aortic Prosthesis Endocarditis: Early and Mid-Term Outcomes.

J Clin Med

December 2024

Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, F-94010 Créteil, France.

This study aimed to analyze the outcomes and challenges associated with surgical redo procedures following aortic valve replacement for acute infective endocarditis. While transcatheter aortic valve implantation is growing in terms of its utilization for degenerative bioprostheses failure, valve-in-valve procedures are limited in acute aortic endocarditis. Surgical interventions for aortic prosthesis endocarditis carry a significant risk, with a higher mortality and morbidity, often requiring concomitant complex procedures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!