A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Influence of tidal volume on functional residual capacity during general anesthesia]. | LitMetric

Background: Ventilation with lower tidal volume improves outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, it is questionable if ventilation strategy using lower tidal volumes created for patients with ARDS can be transferred to healthy patients undergoing general anesthesia. We assessed the effects of ventilation with lower tidal volumes and conventional tidal volumes on functional residual capacity (FRC) and Pa(O2)/FI(O2) (P/F) ratio in patients undergoing general anesthesia for upper abdominal surgery.

Methods: We studied 16 patients undergoing general anesthesia for upper abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized to ventilation with low tidal volume group (7 ml x kg(-1) predicted body weight n = 8) or conventional tidal volume group (10 ml x kg(-1) predicted body weight n = 8). We measured FRC and P/F ratio after induction of general anesthesia and start of surgery in both groups.

Results: There were no differences in FRC and P/F ratio between ventilation with lower tidal volume group and conventional tidal volume group (P > 0.05), but peak airway pressures with conventional tidal volume group were higher than those with lower tidal volume group only after induction of general anesthesia (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Lower tidal volumes are better than conventional tidal volumes in view of airway pressure and lung protective strategy during general anesthesia.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tidal volume
32
lower tidal
24
general anesthesia
24
volume group
24
tidal volumes
20
conventional tidal
20
ventilation lower
12
tidal
12
patients undergoing
12
undergoing general
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!