Effect of implant-abutment connection design on reliability of crowns: regular vs. horizontal mismatched platform.

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and failure modes of regular and horizontal mismatched platforms for implant-abutment connection varying the implant diameter.

Material And Methods: Regular (REG, n = 21, 4.0-mm-diameter implant) and horizontal mismatched (HM, n = 21, 4.6-mm-diameter implant) platform Ti-6Al-4V implants were restored with proprietary identical Ti-6Al-4V abutments and metal crowns (cobalt-chrome, Wirobond 280, BEGO, Bremen, Germany) cemented. Mechanical testing comprised step-stress accelerated-life testing, where crowns were distributed in three loading profiles for fatigue in water, producing timely and clinically relevant fractures. The probability of failure vs. cycles (95% two-sided confidence intervals) was calculated and plotted using a powerlaw relationship for damage accumulation, Weibull modulus (95% two-sided confidence intervals) and then the reliability for a mission of 50,000 cycles at 125 N load (95% two-sided confidence interval) were calculated. Fractography was performed in the scanning electron microscope.

Results: The β-value for group REG (β = 1.37) indicated that fatigue was a factor accelerating the failure, whereas load alone dictated the failure for group HM (β = 0.71). The Weibull parameter contour plot showed no significantly different Weibull modulus for REG (10.24) compared to HM (10.20) and characteristic strength of 162.6 and 166.8 N, respectively (P > 0.91). The calculated reliability for a mission of 50,000 cycles at 125 N load was not significantly different (0.71 for REG and 0.73 for HM). Abutment screw failure was the chief failure mode.

Conclusions: Reliability was not significantly different between groups and failure modes were similar.