A post hoc comparison of the mechanical factors that affected the outcome of experimental metaphyseal- and diaphyseal-lengthening osteotomies in sheep tibiae was performed. The resulting motions between bone segments at the metaphyseal and diaphyseal levels were estimated using measured fixator stiffnesses, postural muscle activity, ground reaction forces, and calculated internal and external loads. Relative displacements of bone segments of up to 2.8 degrees were estimated in postural activities; displacements were up to 4.9 times larger at the metaphyseal than at the diaphyseal osteotomy level. The results suggest that due to these increased motions, mechanically inferior conditions for healing at the metaphyseal-lengthening osteotomy level may counteract any supposedly superior biologic healing potential that the metaphyseal region of the bone may have compared with the diaphyseal region. These results correlate well with the clinical findings of the earlier animal study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Pediatr Orthop B
November 2007
Academic Unit of Orthopaedic and Traumatic Surgery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Limb lengthening by tibial callotasis is usually performed in the metaphysis but may cause growth inhibition. Is diaphyseal lengthening more advantageous? Sixteen immature rabbits underwent 30% diaphyseal lengthening by tibial callotasis. The tibial length was measured on radiographs at the end of the distraction period and after an additional 5 weeks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Orthop Relat Res
April 1994
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore.
Radiographs and charts of 114 consecutive patients who underwent 140 lower-extremity bone-segment lengthening procedures using the Ilizarov external fixator were reviewed. Patient age, bone segment (femur, tibia), corticotomy level (metaphyseal, diaphyseal, double level), and distraction gap (DG) were recorded. Distraction-consolidation time (DCT) was defined as the interval in months from the date of the corticotomy until the DG was healed according to radiographic and manual testing criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Orthop Relat Res
April 1994
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Distraction osteogenesis was performed on 32 adult dogs to compare bone healing at metaphyseal and diaphyseal sites. Sixteen dogs underwent proximal metaphyseal corticotomy and 16 dogs underwent middiaphyseal corticotomy of the left tibiae for gradual lengthening. Each major group was then divided into four subgroups of four dogs each on the basis of zero-, seven-, 14- and 21-day latency periods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Orthop Relat Res
October 1990
Sophies Minde Orthopaedic Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway.
A post hoc comparison of the mechanical factors that affected the outcome of experimental metaphyseal- and diaphyseal-lengthening osteotomies in sheep tibiae was performed. The resulting motions between bone segments at the metaphyseal and diaphyseal levels were estimated using measured fixator stiffnesses, postural muscle activity, ground reaction forces, and calculated internal and external loads. Relative displacements of bone segments of up to 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Orthop Relat Res
October 1989
Sophies Minde Orthopaedic Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway.
In 20 sheep, aged seven to eight months, a tibial lengthening osteotomy was performed to compare the process of repair of the metaphyseal and diaphyseal regions of the bone. Analogous to clinical lengthening, two frame configurations of a bilateral external fixation device were used to obtain adequate fixation of the bone segments in the metaphyseal and diaphyseal lengthening osteotomies. A daily distraction rate of 1 mm for 4.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!