A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Point-to-point registration with mandibulo-maxillary splint in open and closed jaw position. Evaluation of registration accuracy for computer-aided surgery of the mandible. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Computer navigation is crucial for craniomaxillofacial surgery, but accurately transmitting data to the operating room is challenging.
  • The study evaluates the effectiveness of using dental-splint registration for achieving precise navigation in surgeries involving the skull, midface, and mandible.
  • Results show that using a closed-splint position yields an average precision of 2.07 mm, while an open position improves accuracy to 1.53 mm; thus, registration points should be optimally spaced for better navigation precision.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Computer navigation plays an increasingly important role in craniomaxillofacial surgery. The difficulties in computer navigation at the craniomaxillofacial site lie in the accurate transmission of the dataset to the operating room. This study investigates the accuracy of the dental-splint registration method for the skull, midface, and mandible.

Material And Methods: A synthetic human skull model was prepared with landmarks and scanned with cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Two registration splints fixed the mandible against the viscerocranium in two different positions (closed vs. open). The target registration error was computed in all 278 landmarks spread over the entire skull and mandible in 10 repeated measurements using the VectorVision(2) (BrainLAB Inc., Feldkirchen, Germany) navigation system.

Results: If registered in the closed position an average precision of 2.07 mm with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.78 mm was computed for all landmarks distributed over the whole skull. Registration in the open position resulted in an average precision of 1.53 mm (SD=0.55 mm). For single landmarks the precision decreases linearly with distance from the reference markers. The longer the three-dimensional distance between the registration points, the more precise the computer navigation is, mainly in the most posterior area of the cranium.

Conclusion: Our findings in the cranium are comparable with those of other studies. Artificial fixation of the lower jaw via splint seems to introduce no additional error. The registration points should be as far apart from each other as possible during navigation with the splint.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2011.10.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

computer navigation
12
position average
8
average precision
8
registration points
8
registration
7
navigation
5
point-to-point registration
4
registration mandibulo-maxillary
4
mandibulo-maxillary splint
4
splint open
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!