Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The ability of five agrammatic and five anomic aphasic patients to produce nouns and verbs was assessed in four tasks. Target words were form class unambiguous, frequency and length matched nouns and verbs, elicited as single words in picture naming and naming-to-definition tasks. The same unambiguous verbs were targets in an action description task. Narrative speech was obtained from each patient using a story elicitation procedure. Agrammatic aphasics produced significantly fewer verbs than nouns, relative to other groups, in all tasks. Anomic aphasics reliably produced more verbs than nouns in naming to definition. These results replicate previous findings for Italian-speaking patient groups, and for several individual cases. In addition, these results extend the relative verb deficit among agrammatic patients to connected speech tasks. Results are interpreted in light of current models of lexical and sentence production.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(90)90002-x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!