A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validation of HbA1c of 6.5% for diagnosing diabetes mellitus via the use of taxometric analysis. | LitMetric

Purpose: Previous studies in which authors examined the internal and external validity of a glycemic cut-point for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus have provided mixed results. The purpose of the current study was to test the internal validity of the HbA1c 6.5% cut-point with taxometric analysis.

Methods: Data on 14,798 participants were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, years 1999-2008. Fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c were submitted to the taxometric procedures MAMBAC (mean above minus below a cut) and MAXSLOPE (MAXimum SLOPE). The comparison curve fit index was the outcome measure, with values less than 0.40 and greater than 0.60 indicative of dimensional and categorical solutions, respectively.

Results: In the full sample, MAXSLOPE and MAMBAC procedures yielded CCFIs of 0.778 and 0.872, respectively. Analyses were repeated in subgroups by age, sex, fasting insulin level, ethnicity, and year; the lowest comparison curve fit index measurement from any analysis was 0.706.

Conclusions: These results support a categorical overdimensional model of diabetes, consistent with the new HbA1c cut-point recommendation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.10.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hba1c 65%
8
diabetes mellitus
8
comparison curve
8
curve fit
8
validation hba1c
4
65% diagnosing
4
diagnosing diabetes
4
mellitus taxometric
4
taxometric analysis
4
analysis purpose
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!