A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Determining the most suitable costal cartilage level for rhinoplasty: an experimental study. | LitMetric

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of septal cartilage (SC) and costal cartilage (CC) grafts harvested from different ribs and to find at which level CC has characteristics closest to SC.

Study Design: Experimental cadaver study.

Setting: Istanbul Training and Research Hospital.

Material And Method: Cartilage grafts were harvested from the 6th, 7th, and 8th ribs and the SC of 10 fresh cadavers. Shaped cartilage grafts were subjected to a bending test. Results were measured, and the force-deflection curve was plotted. Flexural strength (σ(f)) and flexural modulus of elasticity (E(f)) were determined. Fractured surfaces were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Results: According to F(max), it was determined that ribs 6, 7, and 8 have significantly more durability compared with the SC (Ps = .030, .004, and .001). With regard to deflection, there was no significant difference between the SC and the 6th and 7th ribs and between the 6th and 7th ribs (Ps = 1.000, .088, and .306), while a significant difference was found between the SC and the 8th rib (P = .001). According to σ(f), no differences were seen between the 6th and 7th rib (P = .782), while difference was detected between the 6th and 8th and the 7th and 8th ribs (p = .001). Similar trends were established in E(f) values as in σ(f.) These results were confirmed by SEM images.

Conclusion: The 7th CC can be used as autograft because it shows similar properties to SC. However, the 6th CC is preferred if more flexibility is desired, and the 8th CC is preferred where more strength is needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599811427386DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

6th 7th
16
cartilage grafts
12
costal cartilage
8
grafts harvested
8
7th 8th
8
8th ribs
8
7th ribs
8
ribs
6
6th
6
7th
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!