Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This was a preliminary study to investigate whether hyaline cartilage could be easily identified in mechanically recovered meat (MRM) and whether its presence could be used as a possible marker for MRM in meat products. MRMs produced from beef, pork, lamb, chicken and turkey, using a variety of machine types and processing conditions, were compared to both minced and colloid milled hand-deboned samples, using a chemical staining technique followed by examination using the light microscope. The methodology was tested on various mixtures of MRM and hand-deboned meat. Although this technique, as with most microscopy techniques generally, is not suitable for quantitative determinations, the results indicate that light microscopy could be used as a useful screening method.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(94)00062-c | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!