Background: We aimed to evaluate the incidence of acute toxicity in a 3-week accelerated radiation therapy (RT) schedule with a concomitant boost compared with the 6.5-week conventional schedule with a sequential boost for early-stage, node-negative breast cancer.

Materials And Methods: This study included the first 50 patients treated on protocol using the accelerated schedule as well as 74 patients with comparable stages of disease treated over the same period using the conventional schedule. An accelerated schedule of 40.5 Gy × 2.7 Gy/fraction to the whole breast with 4.5 Gy × 0.3 Gy/fraction concomitant boost, for a delivered total dose of 45.0 Gy × 3.0 Gy/fraction in 15 fractions to the lumpectomy site. The conventional schedule used 46.8 Gy × 1.8 Gy to the whole breast with a sequential boost of 14.0 Gy × 2.0 Gy/fraction, delivering a total dose of 60.8 Gy × 33 fractions to the lumpectomy site. The side effects observed during RT and through the initial 8 weeks after treatment were scored for acute toxicity.

Results: A lower incidence of ≥ grade 2 skin toxicity was observed among patients treated on the accelerated schedule compared with those treated on the conventional schedule (p = .0015). There was a higher incidence of breast pain among patients receiving the conventional schedule (p = .045). No significant difference in the incidence of breast edema, fatigue, or hematologic side effects was observed between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: Our observations suggest that there is acceptable toxicity with the accelerated schedule as used in this study. Further, it is not associated with a higher risk of acute toxicity when compared with the conventional schedule. Patients in the study are being followed, and clinical outcomes will be reported as the data mature.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2011.09.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conventional schedule
28
accelerated schedule
20
schedule
13
acute toxicity
12
concomitant boost
12
sequential boost
12
3-week accelerated
8
schedule concomitant
8
65-week conventional
8
schedule sequential
8

Similar Publications

To evaluate the efficacy of preserving urethral mucosa around verumontanum in all directions and at the prostatic apex on antegrade ejaculation preservation and early postoperative continence in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). A randomized controlled trial was conducted in our tertiary center on patients scheduled for TURP. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To evaluate the effectiveness of a patient portal telehealth outreach program to return patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) lost to follow-up (LTFU) for eye care. Patients with DR receiving intravitreal injection (IVI) therapy who were >90 days beyond recommended return were deemed LTFU. Outreach messages were sent via a patient portal, when available, or through the U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The use of short hydration (SH) to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity lacks substantive prospective evaluation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SH, including those with head and neck cancer (HNC) who are at higher risks of mucositis that causes diminished oral intake.

Methods: This phase II randomized noncomparative trial included patients with cancer who were scheduled to receive high-dose cisplatin (≥60 mg/m) in combination with another chemotherapy or concurrently with radiotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are in general treated with conventional fractionation regimen of 1.8-2 Gy per fraction. Altered fractionation (ALFT) strategies such as hypofractionation radiotherapy (HYPO-RT), accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (AFRT), and hyperfractionation radiotherapy (HFRT) have not been practiced uniformly across centers in different parts of the world.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative visual aids on anxiety and pain management in patients with low educational backgrounds undergoing glaucoma filtering surgery.

Methods: A randomized, single-blinded, single-center clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary eye hospital in Shantou, China. Patients scheduled for glaucoma filtering surgery were randomly assigned to either a conventional oral education group or a visual aids group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!