Psychological therapies for chronic pelvic pain: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand

Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Robert Aitken Institute, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.

Published: March 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common disability in women, and the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological therapies within a biopsychosocial framework compared to other treatments.
  • The research involved a systematic review of literature from various medical databases, focusing on randomized controlled trials that assessed the impact of psychological therapies on CPP compared to no treatment or standard medical approaches.
  • Four relevant studies were identified, showing mixed results on pain reduction, indicating that the evidence is insufficient to conclusively determine the effectiveness of psychological interventions for alleviating self-reported pain in CPP patients.

Article Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP), a common cause of disability in women, is a condition best viewed in the biopsychosocial framework. Psychological interventions are frequently considered alongside medical and surgical treatments. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological therapies for the treatment of CPP. Electronic literature searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and DARE databases from database inception to April 2010. Reference lists of selected articles were searched for further articles. The studies selected were randomized controlled trials of psychological therapies in patients with CPP compared with no treatment, standard gynecological treatment or another form of psychological therapy. Two reviewers independently selected articles without language restrictions and extracted data covering study characteristics, study quality and results. Reduction in pain, measured using visual analog scales or other measurements, was the main outcome measure. Of the 107 citations identified, four studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Compared with no psychological intervention, therapy produced a standardized mean pain score of -3.27 [95% confidence interval (CI) -4.52 to -2.02] and 1.11 (95% CI -0.05 to 2.27) at 3 months and -3.95 (95% CI -5.35 to -2.55) and 0.54 (95% CI -0.78 to 1.86) at 6 months and greater, based on a visual analog scale score of 0-10. The current evidence does not allow us to conclude whether psychological interventions have an effect on self-reported pain scores in women with CPP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01314.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

psychological therapies
12
chronic pelvic
8
pelvic pain
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trials
8
psychological interventions
8
selected articles
8
visual analog
8
psychological
7
pain
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!