A microgap between implant and abutment can lead to mechanical and biological problems such as abutment screw fracture and peri-implantitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate microgap size and microbial leakage in the connection area of 4 different abutments to ITI implants. In this experimental study, 36 abutments in 4 groups (including Cast On, Castable, Solid, and Synocta abutments) connected to Straumann fixtures (with their inner part inoculated with bacterial suspension) and microbial leakage were assessed at different times. The size of the microgap in 4 randomized locations was then measured by scanning electron microscope. The data were analyzed by SPSS software and by 1-way variance statistical test, Kruskal-Wallis, and their supplementary tests (Mann-Whitney HSD and Tukey's; α = .05) at the next step. The effect of using different types of abutments was significant on the mean microgap size (P < .001) and on the mean number of leaked colonies (CFU/mL) through the connection area of the implant and abutment within the first 5 hours of the experiment (P = .012); however, it did not significantly influence microleakage at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 14 days (P = .145). Using Synocta abutments compared with Solid abutments will not provide us with more accommodation, and vice versa. Using Solid and Synocta abutments can significantly decrease the microgap size; however, Cast On abutments do not show a significant difference in terms of microgap compared with Castable abutments. Microleakage in the connection area is comparable for these 4 abutments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00167DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

microgap size
16
connection area
16
microbial leakage
12
synocta abutments
12
abutments
11
size microbial
8
leakage connection
8
area abutments
8
implant abutment
8
solid synocta
8

Similar Publications

Engaging vs. Non-Engaging Abutments: An In Vitro Study Evaluating Changes in Microgap and Screw Morphology.

Dent J (Basel)

August 2024

Preventive and Restorative Department, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA.

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the microgap size between engaging (E) and non-engaging (NE) abutments and screw morphology changes between E and NE abutments using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after cyclic loading (CL).

Methods: Thirty-six implants were arranged into four groups as follows: Group 1, single units with E abutments; Group 2, single units with NE abutments; Group 3, three-unit fixed partial dentures with a hemi-engaging design; and Group 4, three-unit FPDs with two NE abutments. The microgap was evaluated using a stereomicroscope.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the adherence of three types of bacteria [Staphylococcus (S) aureus, Escherichia (E) coli, Pseudomonas (Ps) aeruginosa] and the size of the microgap of three different implant systems (JD, ORA, and Ankylos) under four different screw torque values.

Materials And Methods: Ten samples for each tested implant system were used under different torques to determine the width of the gaps. The abutments were connected to the fixtures using a universal digital wrench.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study investigated the microgaps present at the implant-abutment interface for two types of dental abutments used with monolithic zirconia partial implants: transepithelial versus titanium base.
  • Sixty dental implants were tested, with one group using transepithelial abutments and the other using Ti-base abutments, subjected to simulations mimicking real-life conditions.
  • Results showed that the transepithelial abutments had significantly smaller microgaps (0.270 μm) compared to the Ti-base abutments (3.902 μm), but both types remained within clinically acceptable limits.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We present a solar thermionic energy converter (STEC) incorporating interelectrode spacer structures for solar energy harvesting. We demonstrate the impact of spacer loss on the optimal performance and gap size of STECs with and without interelectrode spacers. Under a solar concentration factor of 100, we show that the maximum efficiency of STECs with a spacer (5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The assessment of microgaps at the implant-abutment interface is an important factor that may influence clinical success. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the size of microgaps between prefabricated and customised abutments (Astra Tech, Dentsply, York, PA, USA; Apollo Implants Components, Pabianice, Poland) mounted on a standard implant. The measurement of the microgap was performed using micro-computed tomography (MCT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!