Objective: Compare the efficacy of 2 NRTIs combined with raltegravir (RAL), efavirenz (EFV), or protease inhibitors (PI) in the management of antiretroviral-naïve HIV adult patients.
Methods: By means of a systematic literature view, 7 randomized controlled trials were identified: 2 RAL vs EFV trials; 1 ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/RTV) vs EFV trial; 1 ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/RTV) vs LPV/RTV trial; 1 ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/RTV) vs LPV/RTV trial; 1 ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir (FPV/RTV) vs LPV/RTV trial; and 1 FPV/RTV vs ATV/RTV trial. Endpoints concerned virological suppression and immunologic efficacy. Trials were analyzed with Bayesian mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.
Results: For up to 24 weeks of treatment, a PI-based regimen resulted in a lower proportion of patients with virological response than an EFV-based regimen, whereas RAL seems more efficacious than EFV up to at least 12 weeks. After 48 weeks, the odds ratio (OR) of virological suppression with RAL relative to EFV was 1.34 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.87-2.07). ORs for PIs relative to EFV varied from 0.68 (0.41-1.07) with LPV/RTV to 0.99 (0.52-1.84) with DRV/RTV. RAL demonstrated a greater improvement in CD4+ T cell counts than EFV at 48 weeks. The PI regimens showed all similar improvements relative to EFV.
Conclusion: Based on available RCTs, the fastest virological suppression is expected with RAL followed by EFV and PIs. Over time, RAL appears to be at least as good as PI and EFV regimens. CD4+ cell recovery seems the greatest with LPV/RTV, DRV/RTV, and RAL. Given the limited number of RCTs, additional studies are recommended.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/hct1204-175 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Simultaneous determination of nirmatrelvir, ritonavir, and beta-D-N4-hydroxycytidine in human plasma and epithelial lining fluid using LC-MS/MS and its clinical application to compare rates of achieving effective concentrations.
Heliyon
January 2025
Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Currently, the trials found that the clinical efficacy of molnupiravir is lower than ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir. An explanation for these different efficacies in clinical treatments is still limited. The analysis method was developed and validated to simultaneously quantify nirmatrelvir, ritonavir, and beta-D-N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC) in human plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparative Effectiveness of Outpatient COVID-19 Therapies in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.
Transpl Infect Dis
January 2025
Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Background: Multiple outpatient therapies have been developed for COVID-19 in high-risk individuals, but solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients were not well represented in controlled clinical trials. To date, few comparative studies have evaluated outcomes between outpatient therapies in this population.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using de-identified administrative claims data from OptumLabs Data Warehouse.
Resolution of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events After Switching to a Doravirine-Based Regimen in the Open-Label Extensions of the DRIVE-AHEAD and DRIVE-FORWARD Trials.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr
January 2025
MSD France, Puteaux, France.
Background: Neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs) are associated with several antiretrovirals. Doravirine (DOR), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for HIV-1 treatment, does not interact significantly with known neurotransmitter receptors in vitro. First-line therapy with DOR-based regimens resulted in significantly fewer NPAEs than efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF) and similar rates to those of ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) through Week 96 of the phase 3 DRIVE-AHEAD and DRIVE-FORWARD studies, respectively.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA unifying model to explain frequent SARS-CoV-2 rebound after nirmatrelvir treatment and limited prophylactic efficacy.
Nat Commun
June 2024
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
In a pivotal trial (EPIC-HR), a 5-day course of oral ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir, given early during symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (within three days of symptoms onset), decreased hospitalization and death by 89.1% and nasal viral load by 0.87 log relative to placebo in high-risk individuals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Randomised comparative data on efficacy and safety of second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) after failure of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) across diverse geographical settings are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate optimal second-line ART for people with HIV.
Methods: DEFT is a completed international, randomised, open-label, phase 3b/4 trial evaluating three second-line ART strategies in adults (aged ≥18 years) with HIV-1 for whom first-line NNRTI therapy has failed.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!