Purpose: This study's purpose was to evaluate the aging effect on the bond strength of 4 adhesive systems on primary dentin 24 hours and 6 months after bonding.
Methods: The crowns of extracted, caries-free primary molars were grounded and flat surfaces were prepared and distributed into 4 groups (n=7-9). The adhesives Scotchbond Multi-purpose (SMP), Single Bond (SB), Clearfil SE Bond (CSB), and Adper Prompt L-Pop (APL) were applied with the composite resin Filtek Z-250. Specimens were stored in distilled water (37°C/24h), the crowns were sectioned, and 0.8-mm² resin-dentin sticks were obtained and divided into 2 groups: (1) 24h; and (2) 6m. Each group's specimens were tested under tensile at 0.5 mm/minute until they fractured. The fractured sticks were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The data were analyzed by 2-way repeated measures: analysis of variance; Tukey's test (P<.05); and Kruskal-Wallis test (P<.05).
Results: The mTBS (MPa) means values were: SMP=33.28 (2.05), SB=23.27 (4.78), APL=20.64 (10.66), and CSB=18.94 (11.94) for the 24-hour group; and SMP=30.59 (6.29), SB=22.39 (5.9), CSB=21.50 (10.67), and APL=17.19 (6.88) for the 6-month group. The most frequent fracture type found was cohesive failure of the adhesive and mixed, with no statistically significant difference found between the groups.
Conclusions: Resin bond strength on primary dentin was not influenced by aging for the adhesive systems tested.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Funct Biomater
December 2024
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8586, Japan.
This study investigated the effects of resin composites (RCs) containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer (S-PRG) filler on the dentin microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing universal adhesives (UAs). Water sorption (WS) and solubility (SL), degree of conversion (DC), and ion release were measured. The UAs BeautiBond Xtreme (BBX; 0% HEMA), Modified Adhesive-1 (E-BBX1; 5% HEMA), Modified Adhesive-2 (E-BBX2; 10% HEMA), and two 2-step self-etch adhesives (2-SEAs): FL-BOND II (FBII; with S-PRG filler) and silica-containing adhesive (E-FBII) were used.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Funct Biomater
December 2024
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 06490 Ankara, Türkiye.
Bond strength between repair and restorative materials is crucial for endodontic success. This study assessed the effects of the following final irrigation solutions on the bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) to a bulk-fill composite: (1) 17% Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA); (2) 2% Chlorhexidine (CHX); (3) 0.2% chitosan; (4) 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Funct Biomater
November 2024
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia.
The aim of the study is to assess the impact of mechanical surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensional (3D) printed and milled CAD/CAM provisional materials. Sixty cylindrical samples were fabricated for each provisional material. Samples were treated with one of the following surface treatments: aluminum oxide airborne particle abrasion, diamond bur rotary instrument roughening, and phosphoric acid etching (control).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDent J (Basel)
December 2024
Faculty of Dentistry, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Adhesion within endodontic obturation material and root canal walls improves the efficacy of the endodontic treatment by establishing a barrier that inhibits reinfection and entombs residual bacteria. This study evaluates the push-out bond strength (POBS) of calcium silicate sealers compared to an epoxy-resin-based sealer. A total of 36 extracted mono-radicular teeth were prepared with Pro Taper Ultimate and irrigated with 5.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
November 2024
Department of Endodontic and Operative Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, SYR.
Objectives This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength of three resin cements (light-cured resin cement, pre-heated composite resin, and dual-cured self-adhesive resin cement) when bonding to lithium disilicate discs. Materials and methods Thirty-six discs made of lithium disilicate were fabricated and etched with 9.5% (HF), and 36 human premolars were collected and immersed in the acrylic molds, then randomly divided into three equal groups (n = 12): Group 1: light-cured resin cement, Group 2: pre-heated resin composite, and Group 3: dual-cured resin cement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!