Gender differences in examinee performance on the Step 2 Clinical Skills data gathering (DG) and patient note (PN) components.

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract

National Board of Medical Examiners, 3750 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,

Published: October 2012

Multiple studies examining the relationship between physician gender and performance on examinations have found consistent significant gender differences, but relatively little information is available related to any gender effect on interviewing and written communication skills. The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 Clinical Skills (CS) examination is a multi-station examination where examinees (physicians in training) interact with, and are rated by, standardized patients (SPs) portraying cases in an ambulatory setting. Data from a recent complete year (2009) were analyzed via a series of hierarchical linear models to examine the impact of examinee gender on performance on the data gathering (DG) and patient note (PN) components of this examination. Results from both components show that not only do women have higher scores on average, but women continue to perform significantly better than men when other examinee and case variables are taken into account. Generally, the effect sizes are moderate, reflecting an approximately 2% score advantage by encounter. The advantage for female examinees increased for encounters that did not require a physical examination (for the DG component only) and for encounters that involved a Women's Health issue (for both components). The gender of the SP did not have an impact on the examinee gender effect for DG, indicating a desirable lack of interaction between examinee and SP gender. The implications of the findings, especially with respect to the validity of the use of the examination outcomes, are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9333-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

examinee gender
12
gender
8
gender differences
8
step clinical
8
clinical skills
8
data gathering
8
gathering patient
8
patient note
8
note components
8
gender performance
8

Similar Publications

Background And Aim: It is important for endoscopist to diagnose the lesion redness. In this study, we focused on the redness of duodenal bulb. We objectively analyzed the changes in redness of the duodenal bulb using linked color imaging (LCI) with chromatic indicators.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Gout is a type of inflammatory arthritis caused by monosodium urate crystal deposits, and the prevalence of this condition has been increasing. This study aimed to determine the combined effects of genetic risk factors and lifestyle habits on gout, using data from a Korean cohort study. Identifying high-risk individuals in advance can help prevent gout and its associated disorders.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is common in patients with obesity and diabetes and can lead to serious complications. This study aimed to evaluate fundus photographs using artificial intelligence to explore the relationships between diabetic retinopathy (DR), MASLD, and related factors. In this cross-sectional study, we included 1,736 patients with a history of diabetes treatment or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of ≥6.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study examined how mothers in Kween District viewed their experiences with male midwives (MMWs) during childbirth, using a qualitative approach to gather insights.
  • Data was collected from 33 mothers through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions at three health facilities, focusing on their feelings and perceptions regarding MMWs.
  • Participants expressed mixed feelings, with some discomfort around male caregivers in an intimate process, but many appreciated the supportive and respectful care provided by MMWs, highlighting the need for awareness campaigns to promote skilled birth attendance regardless of gender.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluating differential item functioning (DIF) in assessments plays an important role in achieving measurement fairness across different subgroups, such as gender and native language. However, relying solely on the item response scores among traditional DIF techniques poses challenges for researchers and practitioners in interpreting DIF. Recently, response process data, which carry valuable information about examinees' response behaviors, offer an opportunity to further interpret DIF items by examining differences in response processes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!