Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of topical diclofenac sodium 1% gel (DSG) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) for up to 12 months.
Methods: This was a multicenter open-label, extension of two 3-month, randomized, double-blind studies of DSG in patients with knee OA (NCT ID: NCT00171691, "Safety of Diclofenac Sodium Gel in Knee Osteoarthritis"). To ensure adequate enrollment, some DSG-naïve patients with OA who had not participated in the double-blind studies were also enrolled. Patients applied 4 g DSG to 1 or both knees 4 times daily for 9 to 12 months. Safety was evaluated through adverse event (AE) reporting, physical examination, and laboratory investigations. Patients completed the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, stiffness, and physical function scales every 3 months to assess long-term effectiveness.
Results: The extension study enrolled 583 patients; 294 patients completed the study. Use of DSG was documented for 578 patients (safety population). The mean age was 62.3 years, and 63.7% of patients were women. Overall, 112 (19.4%) patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-related AE, and the only treatment-related AE occurring in ≥ 1% of patients was application-site dermatitis. Treatment-related gastrointestinal, renal-function, hepatic-function, and cardiovascular AEs were reported by 3, 1, 2, and 0 patients, respectively. There were no serious AEs or deaths. At 1 year, improvements from baseline for WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function scale scores were 39.8%, 33.4%, and 36.9%, respectively.
Conclusion: The long-term safety profile of DSG was consistent with previous 12-week studies, and DSG remained effective for a 1-year period.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3810/psm.2011.09.1918 | DOI Listing |
Chirurgie (Heidelb)
January 2025
Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, LMU Klinikum München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Palliative surgery aims to improve the quality of life for patients with incurable diseases. This patient group is vulnerable due to the underlying illness, prior treatment and comorbidities, which increase the risk of complications that can negatively impact the course of the disease and quality of life. Palliative surgical interventions often provide effective long-term symptom control but are more invasive than conservative, interventional endoscopic or interventional radiological alternatives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFertil Steril
January 2025
Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Objective: To expand knowledge on physical outcomes and psychosocial experiences of oocyte donors after donation across 3 age cohorts.
Design: Cross-sectional mixed-methods survey.
Patients: A total of 363 participants (ages: 22-71 years, M = 38.
Heliyon
January 2025
Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Kalhat, Lebanon.
Background: Transvenous pacemakers (TVP) and leadless pacemakers (LP) are two reliable permanent modalities for the treatment of heart rhythm disorders. Several observational studies explored the safety and efficacy of the two devices. The aim of this meta-analysis study is to present a comparative analysis of the safety of leadless versus transvenous pacemakers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials (FCM) assessed the safety of the recycling process NGR LSP (EU register number RECYC328). The input is hot washed and dried poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) flakes mainly originating from collected post-consumer PET containers, with no more than 5% PET from non-food consumer applications. The flakes are dried (step 2), melted in an extruder (step 3) and decontaminated during a melt-state polycondensation step under high temperature and vacuum (step 4).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the commonly used approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with aortic stenosis at low or intermediate surgical risk. However, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to SAVR for AVR. This meta-analysis aims to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of TAVR versus SAVR in low-to-intermediate surgical risk patients by analyzing temporal trends in the outcomes of TAVR and SAVR at various follow-up intervals, providing a more detailed understanding.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!