Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of macular buckling in eyes with myopic foveoschisis and describe two methods of macular buckling: hard silicone implant and Ando plombe.
Methods: Sixteen eyes of 16 consecutive patients with myopic foveoschisis who underwent surgery with the macular buckling procedure were studied. Pars plana vitrectomy combined with macular buckling with hard silicone implant was used in 6 eyes, whereas the other 10 eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy and macular buckling with the Ando macular plombe.
Results: Macular buckling, with both hard silicone implant and macular plombe resulted in reduction of retinal thickness in all patients. Best-corrected visual acuity improved in 14 of 16 eyes (87.5%), whereas it remained stable or decreased in 2 eyes (12.5%). Mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity was 20/125 (mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution 0.8), whereas mean postoperative best-corrected visual acuity improved to 20/50 (mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution 0.39). Both methods showed a similar rate of complications, the most frequent being the development of localized areas of retinal pigment epithelium atrophy.
Conclusion: Combined pars plana vitrectomy and macular buckling is an effective approach to treat myopic foveoschisis with both anatomical and visual improvement. Despite a similar complication rate with both buckling techniques, macular buckling with the Ando plombe was found to be technically easier with shorter surgical times.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31822e5c32 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Noncryopexy versus cryopexy treatment during scleral buckling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eye (Lond)
January 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Objectives: To evaluate the differences in surgical outcomes between scleral buckling (SB) with noncryopexy and cryopexy methods.
Methods: We systematically searched the Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from their inception until January 1, 2024. A random-effects model was applied, and outcomes are presented as risk ratios (RRs) or standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Preoperative Retinal Detachment Variables Causing Macular Detachment.
Clin Ophthalmol
January 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Purpose: The factors that contribute to the progression of macular involvement in RRD have not been extensively investigated. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between the preoperative characteristics and macular status of the eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the correlations between optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and macular integrity assessment (MAIA) microperimetry (MP) in both a control group and patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Additionally, it assessed differences between the groups and examined whether the time from symptom onset to surgery influenced microvascular or functional changes in the RRD group.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 47 patients who had undergone successful RRD surgery with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and sulfur-hexafluoride (SF6) gas injection, with or without scleral buckling (SB), and a control group of 136 healthy eyes.
Preliminary efficacy and safety results of a new macular buckle model (NPB) in myopic traction maculopathy.
Eur J Ophthalmol
January 2025
Eyecare Clinic, Brescia, Italy.
Purpose: To describe the efficacy and safety outcomes of NPB macular buckle (MB) in myopic traction maculopathy (MTM).
Methods: A monocentric, prospective cohort study of the naïve eyes who underwent MB surgery, alone or combined with vitrectomy (PPV) for MTM, using the new NPB buckle, between December 2022 and June 2024. The anatomical results, postoperative complications, and MB ease of use were analyzed as the main outcomes.
Outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair in Pseudophakic Eyes With Multifocal vs Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.
J Vitreoretin Dis
August 2024
Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
To compare the anatomic and visual acuity (VA) outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair in eyes with a multifocal intraocular lens (IOLs) and eyes with monofocal IOLs. This retrospective matched-cohort study comprised pseudophakic eyes that had pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or PPV with scleral buckling for RRD. Eyes with multifocal IOLs (multifocal group) were matched with eyes with monofocal IOLs (control group) in a 1:2 ratio for age, sex, primary surgeon, timing of surgery from presentation, type of surgery, and macular status.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!