Aims: To evaluate safety and results of the Freepac drug-eluting balloon (DEB) technology for the treatment of chronic femoropopliteal steno-occlusions.

Methods And Results: In a multicentre registry we enrolled 66 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal stenosis and/or occlusion <15 cm (Rutherford stages 2 to 4). Patients were treated first with an undersized uncoated balloon and then with an appropriate sized DEB. In case of unsatisfactory results, nitinol stents were implanted. Clinical evaluations and echo-duplex were performed at baseline, at discharge, and at three months after intervention. Procedural success was 100%. Stents were implanted in 10.8% of the patients. At three months follow-up, the mean ankle-brachial index (ABI) significantly improved from 0.58 ± 0.13 to 0.82 ± 0.25, thus resulting in a Rutherford class improvement (p <0.01) and amelioration of the claudication distance (102 ± 87 vs. 403 ± 160 meters) (p<0.001). No serious adverse events occurred during the follow-up.

Conclusions: The results of this registry demonstrate the safety of mediated paclitaxel elution for the prevention of restenosis in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries after angioplasty. This technique was associated with encouraging results in terms of clinical improvement as well as a lack of adverse events, including target lesion revascularisation, at three months.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4244/EIJV7SKA14DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

paclitaxel-eluting balloon
4
balloon angioplasty
4
angioplasty femoropopliteal
4
femoropopliteal obstructions
4
obstructions acute
4
acute midterm
4
midterm aims
4
aims evaluate
4
evaluate safety
4
safety freepac
4

Similar Publications

Background: To investigate the long-term efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting Legflow balloon catheter in the treatment of "real-world" long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.

Methods: The REFLOW study was a prospective, multi-national, non-randomized, single arm study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon dilatation catheter in the treatment of stenotic or occlusive lesions >150 mm long in the femoropopliteal arteries of symptomatic patients (Rutherford 2-5). A total of 120 study subjects were enrolled in a period of 30 months, between October 2015 and May 2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) provide similar results to drug-coated balloons (DCBs) but are inferior to drug-eluting stents (DES) at 1 year. However, the long-term efficacy of BVS in these patients remains unknown.

Objectives: This study sought to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of BVS in patients with ISR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Randomized Trial Comparing a Stent-Avoiding With a Stent-Preferred Strategy in Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv

May 2024

Division of Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Dermatology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Helmholtz Institute for Metabolic, Obesity and Vascular Research of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Leipzig and University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address:

Background: Limited comparative data exist on different interventional strategies for endovascular revascularization of complex femoropopliteal interventions.

Objectives: In this study, the authors aimed to compare a stent-avoiding (SA) vs a stent-preferred (SP) strategy, promoting optimal lesion preparation and the use of drug-eluting technologies in both arms.

Methods: Within a prospective, multicenter, pilot study, 120 patients with symptomatic complex femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2-4, mean lesion length 187.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) for coronary artery disease (CAD) remains inconclusive. Despite paclitaxel's common use in both DES and DCB, there is a lack of meta-analyses comparing paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of DES and DCB with paclitaxel.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: According to a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, paclitaxel-coated devices (PCDs) for lower limb endovascular revascularization may be associated with increased risk of late mortality.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether PCDs are associated with all-cause mortality in a real-world setting.

Methods: DETECT is a nationwide, exhaustive retrospective cohort study using medico-administrative data from the French National Healthcare System representing >99% of the population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!