Introduction: Patients with extensive surgery in the lumbar and thoracic spine are often not considered for neurostimulation due to the inability to perform a conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trial. We are presenting six such patients in which spinal-peripheral neurostimulation (SPN) was used via a caudal approach.

Methods: Six patients with intractable low back and leg pain following extensive lumbar and thoracic surgeries, up to at least the T10 level, underwent a stimulation trial with one caudal lead and one subcutaneous lead in order to achieve SPN.

Results: In five cases, the trial was successful with coverage of the pain area and at least satisfactory pain relief. All six patients were implanted with a paddle lead(s) and a subcutaneous lead using SPN with good pain control.

Conclusion: SPN with a caudal lead appears to be a viable option for SCS trial in patients with no possibilities for conventional trial lead placement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00397.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spinal cord
8
cord stimulation
8
lumbar thoracic
8
scs trial
8
spn caudal
8
caudal lead
8
subcutaneous lead
8
patients
6
trial
5
lead
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!