AI Article Synopsis

  • - In 2004, Niger launched a control program for schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths, providing 4.3 million treatments to children and adults within two years, primarily through schools and community efforts.
  • - A 2006 study analyzed the economic costs of this program, revealing a total cost of $456,718, with treatment costs at $0.58 per person; school-based treatment averaged $0.76 and community distribution $0.46.
  • - The effectiveness and costs of treatment approaches vary significantly by region, necessitating a careful analysis of distribution methods and economic impacts in order to optimize future program design.

Article Abstract

Background: In 2004 Niger established a large scale schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths control programme targeting children aged 5-14 years and adults. In two years 4.3 million treatments were delivered in 40 districts using school based and community distribution.

Method And Findings: Four districts were surveyed in 2006 to estimate the economic cost per district, per treatment and per schistosomiasis infection averted. The study compares the costs of treatment at start up and in a subsequent year, identifies the allocation of costs by activity, input and organisation, and assesses the cost of treatment. The cost of delivery provided by teachers is compared to cost of delivery by community distributers (CDD). The total economic cost of the programme including programmatic, national and local government costs and international support in four study districts, over two years, was US$ 456,718; an economic cost/treatment of $0.58. The full economic delivery cost of school based treatment in 2005/06 was $0.76, and for community distribution was $0.46. Including only the programme costs the figures are $0.47 and $0.41 respectively. Differences at sub-district are more marked. This is partly explained by the fact that a CDD treats 5.8 people for every one treated in school. The range in cost effectiveness for both direct and direct and indirect treatments is quantified and the need to develop and refine such estimates is emphasised.

Conclusions: The relative cost effectiveness of school and community delivery differs by country according to the composition of the population treated, the numbers targeted and treated at school and in the community, the cost and frequency of training teachers and CDDs. Options analysis of technical and implementation alternatives including a financial analysis should form part of the programme design process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191121PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001326DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cost effectiveness
12
school based
12
cost
10
schistosomiasis soil-transmitted
8
effectiveness school
8
based community
8
economic cost
8
cost delivery
8
treated school
8
school community
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!