A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparative immunohistochemical study of ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma. | LitMetric

Comparative immunohistochemical study of ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod

Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.

Published: December 2011

Objective: Ameloblastic carcinoma combines the histologic features of ameloblastoma with cytologic atypia, regardless of whether it has metastasized. Because of its rarity, there are few immunoprofile studies of ameloblastic carcinoma and few comparative studies of ameloblastic carcinoma and ameloblastoma. In this study, we compared the expression levels of cytokeratins (CKs), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and Ki-67 between ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma, and assessed the usefulness of these markers for differentiating the tumors.

Study Design: We assessed CK7, CK14, CK18, CK19, MMP-2, MMP-9, and Ki-67 expression by immunohistochemistry in 10 cases of ameloblastoma and 7 cases of ameloblastic carcinoma and then compared expression patterns between the 2 groups.

Results: Immunostaining for CK14 and CK19 was diffuse and strongly positive in both tumor types, but staining for CK7 was focally positive in only 1 case of ameloblastoma and absent in all cases of ameloblastic carcinoma. However, there was a significant difference in CK18 expression between the 2 tumors (P = .000). Whereas 80% of ameloblastomas showed negative reactivity for CK18, most cases of ameloblastic carcinomas showed a moderate to strong intensity of immunostaining for CK18. Regarding the expression of MMPs, there were significant differences in parenchymal MMP-2 and stromal MMP-9 expression between the 2 tumors. Compared to ameloblastoma, ameloblastic carcinoma showed significantly strong expression of MMP-2 in parenchymal cells (P = .001) and MMP-9 in stromal cells (P = .013). However, there were no differences in MMP-2 expression of stromal cells and MMP-9 expression of parenchymal cells between ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma. The mean Ki-67 labeling index (LI) of ameloblastic carcinomas was 17.21%, which was significantly higher than that of ameloblastomas (3.57%; P = .002).

Conclusions: The significant expression of CK18, parenchymal MMP-2, stromal MMP-9, and Ki-67 could provide useful markers for differentiating ameloblastic carcinoma from ameloblastoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.06.036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ameloblastic carcinoma
40
ameloblastoma ameloblastic
16
ameloblastic
12
cases ameloblastic
12
carcinoma
10
expression
10
ameloblastoma
9
studies ameloblastic
8
carcinoma ameloblastoma
8
compared expression
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!