Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To investigate the stability and three-dimensional movements of the atlantoaxial joint after artificial atlanto-odontoid joint (AAOJ) arthroplasty.
Method: Ten sets of AAOJ implanted in bony specimens from 10 adults were used to test the pull-out strength of the atlas-axis components with a MTS858 Mini Bionix machine. Another twelve human cadaveric specimens including C(0)-C(4) were used to evaluate the three-dimensional movements of C(1)-C(2) under five different conditions in sequence, that is, the complete specimen, anterior decompression, posterior transarticular screws fixation, AAOJ arthroplasty and fatigue test.
Result: There were significant differences between atlas and axis components in the maximum pull-out strength and trajectory length, however the yield length was not significantly different. The maximum pull-out strength of the atlas and axis was positively correlated with trajectory length (r(1)= 0.880, P < 0.05) and yield length (r(2)= 0.606, P < 0.05), respectively. After AAOJ arthroplasty, the range of movement (ROM) with respect to rotation and the neutral zone of the atlantoaxial joint were close to normal (P > 0.05), but the ROM in flexion-extension and lateral bending was significantly smaller compared with the specimens which underwent anterior decompression (P < 0.05). No abrasion and abnormal mobilization were observed after 2000 cycles of flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation in the fatigue test.
Conclusions: The self-designed AAOJ has excellent biomechanical performance, and AAOJ arthroplasty can restore excellent instant stability and preserve the movement of the atlantoaxial joint.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6583174 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7861.2010.00073.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!