Background And Objectives: We present 2 cases of laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) splenectomy performed with a conventional laparoscope and instruments, and the use of a novel internal retraction device.

Methods: One patient underwent LESS splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), and a pediatric patient with sickle cell disease underwent LESS splenectomy and cholecystectomy. In each case, a 2-cm vertical incision was made within the confines of the umbilical ring, and a SILS port (Covidien, Norwalk CT) inserted. A 5-mm, 30-degree laparoscope and standard 5-mm instruments were used. After isolation of the splenic hilum, one 5-mm trocar of the SILS port was upsized to 12mm, and a laparoscopic stapler was used to divide the splenic artery and vein. An internal retractor consisting of a laparoscopic bulldog clamp with a hook attachment was used to retract the gallbladder, and to secure the specimen retrieval bag during splenic extraction, which eliminated the need for a fourth trocar.

Results: Total operative time was 160 minutes for the LESS splenectomy, and 216 minutes for the LESS splenectomy and cholecystectomy. Both procedures were successfully completed with conventional instrumentation and a SILS port, without the need for additional incisions or trocars. No complications occurred, and both patients had an uneventful recovery.

Conclusions: LESS splenectomy is a feasible procedure that can be performed safely. Although articulating instruments and laparoscopes may offer advantages, they are not necessary for performing LESS splenectomy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3183571PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13125733356918DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sils port
12
laparoendoscopic single
8
single site
8
splenectomy
8
conventional laparoscope
8
laparoscope instruments
8
underwent splenectomy
8
splenectomy cholecystectomy
8
minutes splenectomy
8
site splenectomy
4

Similar Publications

Background: Gastric cancer surgery has advanced with minimally invasive techniques. This study compares outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic surgery plus one port (SILS + 1) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in treating gastric cancer.

Aim: To explore the curative effect of SILS + 1 and CLS on gastric cancer and their influences on prognosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The text discusses a study comparing two surgical approaches, conventional multi-port laparoscopy (CL) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), for patients undergoing Hartmann's reversal (HR), primarily after colostomy.
  • A thorough online search led to the inclusion of two observational studies with 160 patients, revealing that SILS had a significantly shorter operative duration, while other outcomes like mortality and complications showed no significant differences.
  • The conclusion indicates that, despite some limitations in the research, SILS is a quicker method with comparable safety and effectiveness to CL techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The goal of this study was to compare the advantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) and the split-leg supine position single-port plus one laparoscopic surgery (SSP SILS + 1) in esophageal surgery. This study enrolled 73 patients who previously underwent radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from August 2021 to February 2023. Among them, 36 patients underwent SSP SILS + 1, whereas the remaining 37 patients underwentCLS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Laparoscopic approaches and robot-assisted operations are used for colorectal cancer surgery because of their minimal invasiveness. 1 However, changes in intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy can lead to cardiovascular complications in compromised patients; 2 obesity and intraabdominal adhesions may further interfere with laparoscopic procedures. The retroperitoneal approach may facilitate minimally invasive surgery, even in patients with comorbidities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Despite single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) being a standard procedure, its main shortcomings include narrow operating space and instrument collisions. Although the proposal of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS + 1) reduces the operational difficulty, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) involves complex digestive tract resection and anastomosis. To reduce the number of incisions while ensuring the quality of LPD, we propose a single-incision plus two ports LPD (SILPD + 2) procedure wherein a surgeon uses two trocars with a traditional layout while the assistant and scope assistant conduct subumbilical incision.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!