A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The ICI classification for calcaneal injuries: a validation study. | LitMetric

The ICI classification for calcaneal injuries: a validation study.

Injury

Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, P.O. Box 90158, 4800 RK Breda, The Netherlands.

Published: June 2012

Introduction: The integral classification of injuries (ICI), by Zwipp et al. has been developed as a classification system for injuries of the bones, joints, cartilage and ligaments of the foot. It follows the principles of the comprehensive classification of fractures by Müller et al. The ICI was developed for 'everyday use' and scientific purposes. Our aim was to perform a validation study for this classification system applied to the calcaneal injuries.

Methods: A panel of five experienced trauma and orthopaedic surgeons evaluated the ICI score in 20 calcaneal injuries. After 2 months, a second classification was performed in a different order. Inter- and intra-observer variability were evaluated by kappa statistics.

Results: Panel members were not able to evaluate capsule and ligamental injuries based on X-ray and computed tomography (CT) films. Two injuries were excluded for logistical reasons. The inter-observer agreement based on 18 injuries of bone and joints was slight; kappa 0.14 (90% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.22). The intra-observer agreement was fair; kappa 0.31 (90% CI: 0.22-0.41). Overall, the panel rated the system as very complicated and not practical.

Conclusion: The ICI is a complicated classification system with slight to fair inter- and intra-observer variabilities. It might not be a practical classification system for calcaneal injuries in 'everyday use' or scientific purposes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

classification system
16
calcaneal injuries
12
injuries
8
validation study
8
'everyday use'
8
use' scientific
8
scientific purposes
8
inter- intra-observer
8
classification
7
ici
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!