AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Objectives: Japan faces a very serious physician shortage and needs female doctors. However, a previous survey in Japan showed that female physicians were more likely than their male counterparts to resign from their jobs due to marriage and childbearing. According to studies in Western countries, the professional motivation of female physicians is seriously affected by sex-based inequalities in professional opportunities. The purpose of this study was to compare men and women in terms of their encounters with sex-based inequalities in professional opportunities and their related experiences at work, and to investigate factors associated with working among female physicians.

Methods: We sent self-administered questionnaires to 1,346 physicians who graduated from a private university-affiliated school of medicine in June 2009. Beginning with a question asking for responses to the statement, "Females are less likely to be promoted in medical school," the instrument included 14 questions addressing sex-based inequalities in work opportunities; we further developed the scale using factor analyses. We inquired about disadvantages experienced due to sex-based inequalities at work by asking "Have you ever had an experience in which you were not able to obtain a salaried position, an opportunity for promotion, or a permanent position at work because of your gender?"

Results: Data were obtained from 452 men (mean age, 48 years) and 224 women (mean age, 43 years); the response rate was 44% for men and 71% for women. Forty women (18%) acknowledged encountering sex-based disadvantages, whereas only 15 men (3%) reported such phenomena (P < 0.001). Women had higher scores than men on all but one question on sex-based inequalities in work opportunities. Sixty-six percent of female physicians were full-time workers, 32% were part-time workers, and the remaining 2% were unemployed. After adjusting for disadvantageous experiences, having or not having a child, and household income, logistic regression analyses showed that part-time workers were more likely than full-time workers to be married and to report encountering sex-based inequalities in work opportunities, whereas full-time workers were more likely than part-time workers to have qualified as specialists.

Conclusion: The data suggest that qualifying as a specialist and encountering sex-based inequalities in work opportunities are associated with working among female physicians.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sex-based inequalities
28
female physicians
20
inequalities work
20
work opportunities
16
associated working
12
working female
12
encountering sex-based
12
full-time workers
12
part-time workers
12
sex-based
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • - From 2008 to 2020, the gender gap in match rates for general surgery residencies decreased, with female matriculants rising from 42% to 49%, showing progress toward gender parity in the field.
  • - A similar trend was observed in surgical fellowships, where the percentage of females matched increased from 22% in 2007 to 37% in 2018, although males still significantly outnumber females.
  • - The analysis of specific fellowship types (CGSO, pediatric surgery, colorectal surgery) indicated no significant differences in match rates between genders in the most recent cohort, suggesting a move towards equal opportunity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study highlights the importance of addressing gender inequality in diagnosing sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), as existing criteria are often based on male physiology.
  • The research analyzed data from 431 patients to compare two diagnostic definitions: AHI-4 and AHI-3A, finding that AHI-3A resulted in significantly higher diagnoses of SDB, particularly in women.
  • The findings suggest that using AHI-4 may contribute to underdiagnosis in women, emphasizing the need for more accurate criteria to ensure equal treatment opportunities for both sexes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Measles, a highly contagious and potentially fatal disease, remains a significant public health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent measles and achieving high immunization coverage is crucial for protecting children and communities. This study investigated the trends and inequalities in measles immunization coverage among two-year-olds in Sierra Leone between 2008 and 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We sought to investigate disparities in the utilization of next-generation genetic sequencing (NGS) across demographic groups related to several  common cancer subtypes.

Methods: Data on patients aged 65 years or older with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal, lung, and breast cancer between 2015 and 2020 were obtained from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files. Propensity score matching was employed to reduce selection bias, and logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate racial, ethnic, and sex-based disparities in NGS utilization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

COVID-19 vaccine uptake inequality among older adults: A multidimensional demographic analysis.

Am J Infect Control

January 2025

Center for Health Equity, Louisville Metro Department of Health & Wellness, Louisville, KY. Electronic address:

Background: Age, race, ethnicity, and sex are important determinants of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. Older adults (65 years and older) are at the highest risk of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Analyzing their vaccine uptake by subclassifying demographics is rare and can assist vaccination policies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!