Context: Preventing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a pressing public health need.
Objectives: To compare early and delayed exposure-based, cognitive, and pharmacological interventions for preventing PTSD.
Design: Equipoise-stratified randomized controlled study.
Setting: Hadassah Hospital unselectively receives trauma survivors from Jerusalem and vicinity.
Participants: Consecutively admitted survivors of traumatic events were assessed by use of structured telephone interviews a mean (SD) 9.61 (3.91) days after the traumatic event. Survivors with symptoms of acute stress disorder were referred for clinical assessment. Survivors who met PTSD symptom criteria during the clinical assessment were invited to receive treatment.
Interventions: Twelve weekly sessions of prolonged exposure (PE; n = 63), or cognitive therapy (CT; n = 40), or double blind treatment with 2 daily tablets of either escitalopram (10 mg) or placebo (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/placebo; n = 46), or 12 weeks in a waiting list group (n = 93). Treatment started a mean (SD) 29.8 (5.7) days after the traumatic event. Waiting list participants with PTSD after 12 weeks received PE a mean (SD) 151.8 (42.4) days after the traumatic event (delayed PE).
Main Outcome Measure: Proportion of participants with PTSD after treatment, as determined by the use of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) 5 and 9 months after the traumatic event. Treatment assignment and attendance were concealed from the clinicians who used the CAPS.
Results: At 5 months, 21.6% of participants who received PE and 57.1% of comparable participants on the waiting list had PTSD (odds ratio [OR], 0.21 [95% CI, 0.09-0.46]). At 5 months, 20.0% of participants who received CT and 58.7% of comparable participants on the waiting list had PTSD (OR, 0.18 [CI, 0.06-0.48]). The PE group did not differ from the CT group with regard to PTSD outcome (OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.29-2.62]). The PTSD prevalence rates did not differ between the escitalopram and placebo subgroups (61.9% vs 55.6%; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.21-2.77]). At 9 months, 20.8% of participants who received PE and 21.4% of participants on the waiting list had PTSD (OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.40-2.67]). Participants with partial PTSD before treatment onset did similarly well with and without treatment.
Conclusions: Prolonged exposure, CT, and delayed PE effectively prevent chronic PTSD in recent survivors. The lack of improvement from treatment with escitalopram requires further evaluation. Trauma-focused clinical interventions have no added benefit to survivors with subthreshold PTSD symptoms. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00146900.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.127 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med
January 2025
Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
: High-volume online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) has proven to be the most efficient dialysis modality and to offer better clinical outcomes in patients on hemodialysis. Longer and more frequent dialysis sessions have demonstrated clinical and survival benefits. : A single-center observational study of the first one hundred patients on nocturnal every-other-day OL-HDF was conducted with the aim of reporting the experience with this treatment schedule and evaluating analytical and clinical outcomes as well as the patient and technique survival.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAliment Pharmacol Ther
January 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Hertfordshire, UK.
Background: Acid reflux is a common presentation in primary care leading to a high volume of referrals to endoscopy that are often normal.
Aims: To determine whether a non-endoscopic capsule sponge biomarker test could triage patients with low-risk reflux symptoms, reduce endoscopy waiting lists and identify Barrett's oesophagus in a real-world setting.
Methods: Patients with reflux symptoms on NHS endoscopy waiting lists who were offered a capsule sponge (test group) between February 2021 and August 2022 were included in this national multicentre prospective cohort study and compared with eligible patients on the standard endoscopy pathway (counterfactual group).
Prim Health Care Res Dev
January 2025
Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Aim: We describe activity, outcomes, and benefits after streaming low urgency attenders to eneral practice services at oor of ccident and mergency departments (GDAE).
Background: Many attendances to A&Es are for non-urgent health problems that could be better met by primary care rather than urgent care clinicians. It is valuable to monitor service activity, outcomes, service user demographics, and potential benefits when primary care is co-located with A&E departments.
J Sex Med
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1018HV, The Netherlands.
Background: Although many transmasculine individuals undergo 1 or more gynecological surgeries (ie, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, tubectomy, or colpectomy), little has been published about motivation, subjective experiences, and the effect on dysphoria and quality of life.
Aim: The aim of this study was to acquire an in-depth understanding of patients' motivations and experienced outcomes of gynecological gender surgery.
Methods: In this qualitative study, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted.
J Eval Clin Pract
February 2025
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Rationale: Hospitals are increasingly utilising allied-health professionals to provide clinical triage to patients. While these positions are routinely implemented, and several observational studies have reported positive outcomes, the effectiveness of this intervention has been rarely tested in a clinical trial.
Aims And Objectives: The objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate a podiatry-led orthopaedic triage service using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and (ii) determine if it is cost-effective in terms of incremental cost/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!